نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری ژئومورفولوژی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم تحقیقات گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، تهران، ایران
2 استاد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم تحقیقات
3 استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The first step in natural resources management and development plans is mapping and identification of areas with landslide hazard potential. The purpose of this research is evaluation of landslide hazard of Oghan watershed basin in Golestan province using Fuzzy-based model. For this, first Landslide dispersion maps of the basin were prepared using aerial photos, geological maps and field studies, then map of each of the effective factors in landslide occurrence such as (elevation, slope and aspect, lithology, rain classes, land use, distance from fault, distance from streams and roads) as information layers in Geographical Information System (GIS) were prepared and have been used in fuzzy-based model. After standardization of each mentioned layers using fuzzy membership function and combination based on fuzzy operators (sum, and, or, product and gamma), map of landslide hazard zoning was prepared in four danger classes that are low, medium, high and very high. Results, in comparison with other operators, showed that zoning map of the Gamma fuzzy operator (0.5) with quality sum(Qs) of 1.17 has the highest accuracy and Sum, And and OR operators with Qs less than 0.039 have the lowest accuracy in landslide hazard zoning of Oghan watershed.
Key words: Mapping, Landslide, Fuzzy model, Oghan watershed, Golestan Province.
Extended abstract
Introduction
Landslide is one of the most destructive natural events in steep areas. Due to its geographical position, climatic and geomorphological conditions, population increase, pressure on natural resources and land use change, Iran is exposed to natural hazards like landslide. Therefore, identification and preparation of natural
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
19. Aksoy, B. and Ercanoglu, M. 2012. Landslide identification and classification by object-based image analysis and fuzzy logic: An example from the Azdavay region (Kastamonu, Turkey) Computers & Geosciences, 38: 92-97.
20. Anbalagan, R. 2004. Landslide hazard evaluation and zoning mapping in Mount- Ainous Terrain, Engineering Geol. pp: 36.
21. Bonham Carter, F.G. 1991. Geographic Information System for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS, Pergamon, Ontario, Pp 568.
22. Cornforth, D.H. 2005. Landslides in Practice: Investigation, Analysis, and Remedial/ Preventive Options in Soils, John Wiley Publication: Hoboken, 596p.
23. Cruden, D.M. 1991. A Simple Definition of a landslide, Bulletin of International Association of Engineering Geology, 43: 27-29.
25. Garae, P. 2006. A review of mass movement in order to model landslide hazard zonation in the regional watershed Lajym River, M.Sc. thesis University of Mazandaran, Sari College of Natural Resources, pp: 185.
26. Hussin, H.Y. 2016. V Zumpano, P Reichenbach, S. Sterlacchini, M. Micu. Different landslide sampling strategies in a grid-based bi-variate statistical susceptibility model, Geomorphology, 15: 508-523.
27. Jade, S., and Sarkar, S. 1993. Statistical Models for Slope Instability Classification, Engineering geology, 36: 91-98.
28. Kanungo, D.P., Arora, M.K., Sarkar, S. and Gupta, R.P. 2006. A Comparative Study of Conventional, ANN Black Box, Fuzzy and Combined Neural and Fuzzy Weighting Procedures for Landslide Susceptibility Zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas, Engineering Geology, 85: 347-366.
29. Lan, H.X., Zhou, C.H., Wang, L.J., Zhang, H. Y. and Li, R.H. 2004. Landslide hazard spatial analysis and prediction using GIS in the Xiaojiang Watershed, Yunnan, China. Engineering Geology, 76: 109-128.
30. Mayavan, N. and Sundaram, A. 2012. Statistical analysis for landslide in relation to landuse, in Sirumalai Hill, Dindigul district, Tami Nadu, India, using GIS. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 1(12): 36-39.
31. Moreiras, S.M. 2005. Lndslide susceptibility zonation in the Rio Mendoza valley, Argantina, geomorphology, 66: 345-357.
32. Murat, E. and Candan, G. 2003. Use of fuzzy relation to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide pron area (west black sea region, turkey), Engineering geology, 75: 24.
33. Naderi, F. Naseri, B. Karimi, H. and Habibi Bibalani, Gh. 2010. Efficiency evaluation of different landslide susceptibility mapping methods (Case study: Zangvan watershed, Ilam province): First international conference of soil and roots engineering relationship (LANDCON1005), Ardebil Province, Iran.
34. Riedel, L., Vacik, H. and Kalasek, R. 2000. MapModels, a new approach for spatial decision support in silvicultural decision making. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 27: 407-412.
35. Yalcin, A. 2008. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): Comparisons of results and confirmations, Catena, 72: 1-12.
36. Sabuya, F., Alves, M.G. and Pinto, W.D. 2006, Assessment of failure susceptibility of soil slopes sings fuzzy logic, Engineering Geology, pp: 14.
37. Wong W-D., Xie C-M. and Du X-G. 2009. Landslides susceptibility mapping in Guizhou province based on fuzzy theory. Mining Science and Technology (China), 19(3): 399-404.
)