Evaluation of the ecological capability of Haftad-Gholleh protected area in order to upgrade higher level of conservation to National Park and Biosphere Reserve

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Arak University, Arak, Iran

Abstract

Evaluation of land ecological capability to achieve the planned objectives according to the IUCN, protected areas must be zoned in the process of evaluation of environmental capabilities. This study was done to determine the ecological capability of Haftad-Gholleh protected area in order to upgrade higher level of conservation to National Park and Biosphere Reserve by compilation of systemic analysis and MCDA methods. In this regard, we used Analytical Network Process (ANP) method by using Super Decisions software, with 11 alternatives, 3 criteria, and 10 sub-criteria. In order to achieve it, 508 environment units in the area were achieved with preparing the map of stable and unstable ecological resources, and socioeconomic resources of the area and its analysis and concluding by GIS (scale 1: 25,000). The maps of ecological potential were prepared by comparing the homogeneous units with the special ecological model of the area, and then, with the integration of units with the same usage, a first base map of zoning and eventually the final zoning map with prioritizing and organizing the primary zones as the units of planning was prepared. The results showed that the percentages of the restricted nature zones, the protected zone, the extensive recreation zone,  the concentrated recreation zone, the recovery zone, the other uses zone and the special use zone, also the percentages of the core zone, buffer zone and transition zone are  53.63% (62884.5hectares), 27.10% (31764.42 hectares), 4% (4697.28 hectares), 0.27% (326.04 hectares), 0.10% (114.6 hectares), 14.98% (17565.17 hectares), 15.67%, 39.84 %, and 44.57%, respectively. Accordingly, the Haftad-Gholleh area has the minimum zone required to upgrade to a national park and biosphere reserve
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Evaluation of land ecological capability to achieve the planned objectives according to the IUCN, protected areas must be zoned in the process of evaluation of environmental capabilities. For this purpose, it is also necessary to consider the land potential. In order to comply with the sustainable development goal, it is worth using the capabilities of GIS to increase the speed and accuracy of the environmental assessment. In this study, the capabilities of Haftad-Gholleh protected area are processed to determine the National Park and Biosphere Reserve. This research used ANP as a powerful multicriteria decision-making method.
 
 Methodology
Haftad-Gholleh National Park, with an area of 117252.27 ha, is situated 25 km east of the city of Arak and 15 km to southwest of Mahallat.  It fits within the latitudinal and longitudinal bounds of 37° to 38° N and 40° to 44° 20’ E, respectively.  The mean annual precipitation is 349 mm, and temperature fluctuations range from -30°C to 38°C. The park was designated as a hunting-prohibited area in 1974 under the protection of the Department of Environment.  The most important mountain range in the area is the Haftad-Gholleh Mountains. Barfshah Mountain, with a height of 2993m, is the highest summit. Chekab and Sibak are among the most important valleys having springs used as water sources by wild animals. Haftad-Gholleh National Park is the only main protected territory in Markazi Province, which has been declared as a conservation area for the protection of wild goats and wild sheep. This area's most important wildlife includes wild goats, sheep, cats, caracals, Persian leopards, grey wolves, badgers, and hedgehogs. In Haftad-Gholleh National Park, the wild goat is one of the species with considerable conservation importance; the wild goat of Haftad-Gholleh is known as a symbol of the biodiversity of Markazi Province. This study determined the ecological capability of Haftad-Gholleh protected area to upgrade a higher level of conservation to the National Park and Biosphere Reserve by compiling systemic analysis and MCDA methods. In this regard, we used Analytical Network Process (ANP) method by using Super Decisions software, with 11 alternatives, 3 criteria, and 10 sub-criteria.  In order to achieve it, 508 environment units in the area were achieved by preparing the map of stable and unstable ecological resources and socioeconomic resources of the area and its analysis and concluding by GIS (scale 1: 25,000). First, all the necessary information and essential maps were collected. After that, based on Makhdoom’s ecological model for Iran, all the layers were evaluated. Then, the maps of ecological potential were prepared by comparing the homogeneous units with special ecological model of the area, and then with the integration of units with the same usage, a first base map of zoning, and eventually the final zoning map with prioritizing and organizing the primary zones as the units of planning was prepared.
 
Results and discussion
Haftad-Gholleh area is due to the diversity of animals and plants and the dispersion of valuable species of different subspecies of wild sheep, goat, Persian leopard, houbara, Persian gazelle, and Fritillaria. The area percentage of severe protection restriction (core 1) is 53.63%, and the protection area (core 2) 27.10% should be considered one of the four national park categories. The total of the above two zones is 80.73% of the total area in the Haftad-Gholleh protected area. This amount is even higher than the total safe and protective zones of Kavir National Park, which is equivalent to 49.6% in terms of percentage. and having the minimum area required for national parks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 3 areas of the biosphere reserve, so there is a need to upgrade the area to a national park and biosphere reserve. There are 7 zones (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8). The largest area is for zone 1 (53.63%) and zone 5 (0.10%). According to the results, the percentages of the restricted nature zones, the protected zone, the extensive recreation zone, the concentrated recreation zone, the recovery zone, the other uses zone, and the special use zone, also the percentages of the core zone, buffer zone and transition zone are 53.63% (62884.5hectares), 27.10% (31764.42 hectares), 4% (4697.28 hectares), 0.27% (326.04 hectares), 0.10% (114.6 hectares), 14.98% (17565.17 hectares), 15.67%, 39.84 %, and 44.57%, respectively.
 
Conclusion
Accordingly, due to the large extent of the protection zone, Haftad-Gholleh area has a high conservation value. The Haftad-Gholleh area has the minimum zone required to upgrade to a national park and biosphere reserve.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
 Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper
 
.

Keywords


  1. Rezazadeh, S., Jahani, A., Makhdoum, M., & Meigooni, H, G. (2017). Evaluation of the Strategic Factors of the Management of Protected Areas Using SWOT Analysis Case Study: Bashgol Protected Area Qazvin Province. Open Journal of Ecology, 7, 55-68.
  2. MAB digest. (1998). A guide to biosphere reserve management: A methodology applied to French biosphere reserves.
  3. Ardakani, T., Danehkar, A., Karami, M., Aghighi, H., Rafiei, Gh. R., & Erfani, M. (2011). Chabahar Golf Zoning Using Multiple Criteria Decisionfor Central Recreation. Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal, 1(1), 1-20. [In Persian].
  4. Dehdar Dargahi, M., & Makhdoum, M. (2002). Zoning of Golestan National Park. Journal of Environmental Studies, 28(29), 4-99. [In Persian].
  5. Dehdar Dargahi, M., & Makhdoum, M. (2003). Zoning of Kavir National Park. Journal of National Environment, 56(3), 9-41. [In Persian].
  6. DOE, Markazi. (2010). Natural Features Atlas of Markazi Province. Publisher: NAQSH-E MANA by Order of Department of Environment Markazi.[In Persian]
  7. DOE Markazi .(2020). Report of census on the population of mammals in the Haftad-Gholleh protected area. http://markazi.doe.ir/Portal/. [In Persian]
  8. Farashi, A., & Shariati, M. (2013). Protective Zoning of Kolah Ghazi National Park with a multi-criteria evaluation approach. Environmental Science and Bioengineering, 57, 75-82. [In Persian].
  9. Jahani, A. (2016). Modeling of forest canopy density confusion in environmental assessment using artificial neural network. Forest and Poplar Research, 24(2), 310-322.
  10. Jozi, S. A., Rezaian, S. & Aghamiri, K. (2012). Evaluation of Environmental Capability of Varjin Protected area for Implementation of Tourism by Using Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation Method (SMCEM). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, (14)1, 83-96.
  11. Laghai, H. A., Monavari, M. & Raisi, B. (2009). Planning and zonning for Harra biosphere reserve according to international scales (with emphasis on Qeshm island) using GIS. Human & Environment, 7(1), 30-39.
  12. Madjnoonian, H. (2001). Environmental Capability Evaluation of Lavandville wildlife Sanctury. Journal of Environmental Studies, 27(27), 23-33. [In Persian]
  13. Madjnoonian, Henrik. (2015). National Parks Planning . Day Negar Publisher. 309 p. [In Persian]
  14. Makhdoum, M. (2011). The foundation of land management. Twelfth edition. University of Tehran Press. 304 p. [In Persian]
  15. Makhdoum, M., Darwish Sefat, A.A., Jafarzadeh, H. & Makhdoum, A. R. (2001). Environmental assessment and planning with geographic information systems (GIS). University of Tehran Press. [In Persian].
  16. Masoudi, M., joker, P. & sadeghi, M. (2015). Ecological capability evaluation of industrial, rural and urban development in Darab. Journal of Natural Ecosystem of Iran, 6(3), 49-58. [In Persian].
  17. Moradpanah, M. & Moradpanah, H. (2017). Zoning of Maloosan protected area using GIS. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(4), 464-474. [In Persian]
  18. Mohebi, , Hossein Ali, F., Al-Sheikh, A. A., & Kazem, A. H. (2022). Ecological Evaluation for Land Use Planning Based on Multi Criteria Decision Making Model Using GIS, Case Study: Taleghan Watershed. Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly, 11(42), 41-56. [In Persian].
  19. Najmizadeh, S. & Yavari, A. R. (2006). Ecological capability evaluation of Khabr National Park for Zoning and planning with the help of GIS. Journal of Environmental Studies, 31(38), 47-58. [In Persian]
  20. Rezazadeh, S., Jahani, A., Goshtasb, H., & Makhdoum Farkhondeh, M. (2018). Evaluation of the ecological capability of Bashgol protected area using zoning approach and assessment of feasibility of its upgrade to higher level of conservation. Journal of Animal Environmental. 10(4), 163-172.[In Persian],
  21. Royan Consultant, (2003). Management comprehensive plan of the Haftad-Gholleh Protected Area. DOE of Markazi Province. [In Persian].
  22. MAB digest 19. (1998). A guide to biosphere reserve management: A methodology applied to French biosphere reserves.
  23. Zebardast, E. (2010). The Application of Analytic Network Process (ANP) in Urban and Regional Planning. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba Memari-Va-Shahrsazi, 2(41),79-90
  24.