نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی کارشناسیارشد مخاطرات آب و هوایی، دانشگاه گلستان
2 استادیار گروه جغرافیا دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گلستان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Abstract
The simulated weather data for future planning in the field of natural and human resources is of paramount importance. Including the ability to forecast droughts, which in this case can be reduced with systematic planning of possible losses. In this study, data HADCM3 model under emission scenarios A1B, A2 and B1 to predict the meteorological data of North Khorasan province were simulated using LARS WG statistical dust. For this purpose, after calibration, validation and modeling data on selected stations, data base model in terms of compliance with simulated values (2012-1993-2032-2013) using three criteria Root Mean Square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean bias error (MBE) were evaluated. Using indices SPI and RDI to get wet and drought periods during the simulated under the scenarios B1, A2, A1B was developed. . The results show that the frequency of droughts over the forecast period under all three scenarios compared to the baseline and annual month-long scale using SPI and RDI decreased to indicates % of the occurrences on the other hand grew wet. The highest frequency of normal class time devoted gained in both scale. More from the base period of the indices using SPI and RDI is predicted.Drought and climate phenomena will be appointed as part of the climate of a region. It has features that separates it from other natural disasters. Drought long-term shortage of rainfall in the period so that the moisture in the soil, causing reduced water flow And thereby disrupt human activities and natural life plants and animals. From a cognitive point of view of climate, when the rainfall received in a place in a certain period of time is less than average precipitation location, we are faced with drought (spunky, 1374).
کلیدواژهها [English]
10. کمال، علیرضا، مساح بوانی، علیرضا. 1389. تأثیر تغییر نوسانات اقلیمی بر رواناب حوضه با دخالت عدم قطعیت دو مدل هیدرولوژی، نشریه آب و خاک، شماره 5، ص 931-920.
11. محسنی ساروی، محسن. صالح پورجم، امین. بذرافشان، جواد. خلیقی سیگارودی، شهرام. 1392. بررسی اثر تغییر اقلیم بر ویژگیهای خشکسالی دورة آتی با کاربرد مدل گردش عمومی جو HadCM3(مطالعة موردی: شمال غربی ایران) مجله منابع طبیعی ایران، شماره 4.
12. معافی مدنی، سیده فاطمه، موسوی بایگی، محمد، انصاری، حسین. 1391. پیشبینی وضعیت خشکسالی استان خراسان رضوی طی دورة 2030-2011 با استفاده از ریزمقیاس نمایی آماری خروجی مدل WG5-LARS جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی، شماره 3، صص 21-37.
13. ملکی، علیرضا، ترکمانی، محمدجواد. 1394. مدیریت خشکسالی برای استفاده بهینه از منابع آب استان خراسان شمالی، تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی، شماره 1، صص89- 65 .
15.Barrow, E., and Yu, G. 2005. Climate Scenario for Alberta. A report prepared for the priarie Adaptation Research Climate Research Services.
16.Harmel, R.D. 2002. Evaluating the adequacy of simulating maximum and minimum daily air temperature with the normal distribution. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 41: 744-753.
17.Harmsen, E., Miller, N.L., Schlegel, N.J., and Gonzalez, J.E. 2009. Seasonal climate change impacts on evapotranspiration, precipitation deficit and cop yield in Puerto Rico. Agricultural Water Management, 96(7): 1085-1095.
18.Kirono, D.G.C., Kent, D.M., Hennessy, K.J., and Mpelasoka, F. 2011. “Characteristics of Australian droughts under enhanced green house conditions: results from global climate models”, Journal of Arid Environment, 75: 566- 575.
19.Loukas, A., Vasiliades, L., and Tzabiras, J. 2008. Climate change effects on drought severity. Department of Civil engineering, University of Thessaly, 38334 Volos, Greece, Adv. Geosci. 17: 23-29, www.advgeosci.net/17/23/2008.
20.McKee, T.B., Doesken, N.J., and Kleist, J. 1995. Drought monitoring with multiple time scales. Preprints, 9th Conference on Applied Climatology, January 15-20, Dallas, Texas. 233-236.
21.Rosenberg, N.J., Brown, R.A., Izaurralde, R.C., and Thomson, A.M. 2003. Integrated assessment of Hadley Centre (hadcm2) climate change projections on agricultural productivity and irrigation water supply in the conterminous United States: I. Climate change scenarios and impacts on irrigation water supply simulated with the HUMUS model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 117(1): 73-96.
22.Rossi, G. 2000. Drought mitigation measures: a comprehensivc framework .In Drought and Drought Mitigation in Europe. j. voght and f. somma (Eds) kluwer Academic publisher ,Dordrecht.
23.Semenov, M.A., and Barrow, E.M. 2002. A stochastic weather generator for use in climate impact studies. User Manual: Hertfordshire, UK. Taulis, M.E., & Milke, M.W. 2005. Estimation of WSIM weather simulation parameters in arid climates. Ecological Modeling, 184: 177-191.
24.Vangelis, H., Tigkas, D., and Tsakiris, G. 2013. The effect of PET method on Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI) calculation, Journal of Arid Environments 88: 130-140.
25.Vrochidou, A.-E.K., Tsanis, I.K., Grillakis, M.G., and Koutroulis, A.G. 2013. “The impact of climate change on hydrometeorological droughts at a basin scale”, Journal of Hydrology, 476: 290-301.