مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا

مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا

تحلیل فضایی-زمانی آلاینده‌های جوی در شهر کرمان با بهره‌گیری از داده‌های سنجش از دور ماهواره Sentinel-5P

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه مدیریت مناطق خشک و بیابانی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
2 گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
10.30488/gps.2026.553111.3870
چکیده
در سال‌های اخیر، داده‌های سنجنده TROPOMI ماهواره Sentinel-5P به‌عنوان ابزاری کارآمد برای پایش فضایی_زمانی آلودگی هوا مورد توجه قرار گرفته‌اند. هدف این پژوهش، بررسی الگوی فضایی_زمانی چهار آلاینده اصلی هوا شامل دی‌اکسید نیتروژن (NO₂)، مونوکسید کربن (CO)، دی‌اکسید گوگرد (SO₂) و شاخص جذب آئروسل (AAI) در محدوده شهری کرمان طی دوره ۲۰۱۸ تا ۲۰۲۴ است. بدین منظور، نقشه‌های سالانه و فصلی آلاینده‌ها استخراج، داده‌های ماهواره‌ای Sentinel-5P با داده‌های ایستگاه زمینی میدان مشتاق اعتبارسنجی و ارتباط آلاینده‌ها با دمای سطح زمین، پوشش گیاهی، ارتفاع و تراکم راه‌ها تحلیل شد. همچنین، به‌منظور ارزیابی فشار تجمعی آلودگی، شاخص ترکیبی آلودگی هوا (CIAP) محاسبه گردید. نتایج نشان داد که تمامی آلاینده‌ها دارای تغییرات فصلی مشخص بوده و غلظت CO و NO2 در سال ۲۰۲۲ کاهش محسوسی را تجربه کرده است که احتمالاً با کاهش فعالیت‌های انسانی ناشی از همه‌گیری COVID-19مرتبط است. منطقه ۴ شهر کرمان با میانگین CIAP برابر 0.773 بالاترین سطح آلودگی و بیشترین مقادیرNO2 و CO را نشان داد، در حالی‌که کمترین مقدار CIAP (0.647) در منطقه ۳ مشاهده شد. اعتبارسنجی داده‌های ماهواره‌ای با داده‌های ایستگاه زمینی همبستگی قابل قبولی را نشان داد؛ به‌گونه‌ای که بیشترین ضریب همبستگی برای SO₂ (R=0.52) و کمترین آن برای AAI (R=0.43) به‌دست آمد. همچنین، همبستگی مثبت بین NO2 و CO (r=0.79) مشاهده شد و آلاینده‌ها نیز با تراکم راه‌ها همبستگی مثبت (r=0.62) و با ارتفاع و پوشش گیاهی همبستگی منفی نشان دادند. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که داده‌های Sentinel-5P، در ترکیب با تحلیل‌های آماری، ابزار مناسبی جهت پایش کیفیت هوا و حمایت از مدیریت و سیاست‌گذاری محیط‌زیستی در مناطق خشک هستند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Atmospheric Pollutants over Kerman City Using Sentinel-5P Remote Sensing Data

نویسندگان English

Alireza Rashki 1
Sajjad Taleghani 2
1 Department of Arid and Desert Areas Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده English

A B S T R A C T
In recent years, Sentinel-5P satellite data have proven effective for monitoring spatiotemporal air pollution. This study analyzes four major pollutants - NO₂, CO, SO₂, AAI - over Kerman, southeastern Iran during the period 2018–2024. Annual and seasonal distribution maps were generated, and satellite data validated with ground measurements. Correlations with LST, EVI, DEM, and road density were examined, and a Composite Index of Air Pollution (CIAP) was developed. The results revealed clear seasonal variability in pollutant concentrations, with higher levels generally observed during colder seasons. A noticeable decline in CO and NO₂ concentrations was detected in 2022, highly likely associated with reduced human activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Spatial analysis indicated that urban Zone 4 exhibited the highest mean CIAP value (0.773), alongside elevated concentrations of NO₂ and CO, whereas the lowest CIAP value (0.647) was observed in Zone 3. Validation results demonstrated acceptable agreement between satellite and ground-based observations, with correlation coefficients of 0.52 for SO₂, 0.50 for CO, 0.48 for NO₂, and 0.43 for AAI. Correlation analysis further showed strong positive relationships between NO₂ and CO (r = 0.79) and between pollutant levels and road density (r up to 0.62), while negative correlations were observed with elevation and vegetation cover. Overall, the findings confirm the capability of Sentinel-5P data for urban air quality monitoring in arid environments and highlight the combined influence of anthropogenic and environmental factors on air pollution patterns, providing valuable insights for urban air quality management and environmental policymaking.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Air pollution has emerged as a major environmental challenge of the 21st century, affecting human health, ecosystem functionality, and urban environments. In developing countries, rapid urbanization, industrial growth, and increasing vehicular emissions have intensified air pollution. Among the major atmospheric pollutants, nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), sulfur dioxide (SO₂), carbon monoxide (CO), and aerosols have important environmental and health implications. Kerman, located in southeastern Iran, is particularly relevant for air-quality assessment because of its arid climate, expanding urban area, industrial activities, and limited vegetation cover.
Urban air pollution is influenced by anthropogenic and environmental factors, including population density, industrial activities, traffic intensity, land use, meteorological conditions, topography, and vegetation cover. These factors contribute to spatial and temporal variations in pollutant distributions. Although ground-based monitoring stations provide valuable air-quality data, their limited spatial coverage can restrict the assessment of pollution patterns across urban areas.
Satellite remote sensing offers a complementary approach to overcoming these limitations. The Sentinel-5P satellite, equipped with the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), provides observations of several atmospheric constituents, including NO₂, SO₂, CO, and aerosol-related indicators. These observations enable the investigation of pollutant distributions and their temporal variations over large areas. Previous studies have demonstrated the value of Sentinel-5P and geographic information systems (GIS) for identifying pollution patterns and hotspots. Research in Iran has also highlighted the influence of industrial activities, meteorological conditions, wind patterns, and geographical characteristics on atmospheric pollution. In addition to assessing individual pollutants, composite indicators can provide an integrated representation of pollution. The Combined Index of Air Pollution (CIAP) combines information from multiple pollutants to facilitate the identification and comparison of areas experiencing relatively high cumulative pollution pressure.
Despite advances in satellite-based air-quality assessment, a comprehensive spatial and temporal analysis of multiple pollutants in Kerman over an extended period remains necessary. Therefore, this study investigates the spatial and temporal patterns of NO₂, SO₂, CO, and the Aerosol Absorbing Index (AAI) in Kerman during 2018–2024. It also develops and applies the CIAP index, evaluates satellite observations against ground-based monitoring data, and examines the relationships between pollutants and selected environmental and anthropogenic variables. The findings aim to improve understanding of urban air pollution in Kerman and support air-quality monitoring and management in areas with limited ground-based monitoring infrastructure.

Methodology
This study investigated the spatial and temporal patterns of NO₂, CO, SO₂, and the Aerosol Absorbing Index (AAI) in Kerman during 2018–2024 using Sentinel-5P satellite observations. The analysis comprised three components: pollutant trend and spatial-distribution analysis, development and validation of the Combined Index of Air Pollution (CIAP), and assessment of relationships between pollutants and environmental and anthropogenic factors.
Pollution Trend Analysis and CIAP Index Development
Satellite observations from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) aboard Sentinel-5P were obtained through Google Earth Engine (GEE) for January 2018–December 2024. Annual and seasonal composites were generated to examine temporal variations and spatial distributions of NO₂, SO₂, CO, and AAI. The processed datasets were subsequently transferred to ArcGIS Pro for spatial analysis and, where necessary, resampling to establish a consistent spatial framework.
The CIAP index was developed to provide an integrated assessment of relative pollution pressure. Because satellite observations represent atmospheric column measurements and are not directly equivalent to health-based permissible concentration standards, each pollutant was normalized using the minimum–maximum method to obtain dimensionless values between 0 and 1. The normalized variables were then aggregated through weighted averaging, with equal weights assigned to all pollutants because locally applicable information on their relative toxicity was unavailable. CIAP was interpreted as a relative composite indicator for comparing pollution intensity across the study area, rather than as a substitute for individual pollutant assessments or health-based air-quality standards.
Validation Using Ground-Based Data
Satellite observations were evaluated against daily measurements from the Moshtagh air-quality monitoring station for 2018–2022. Satellite and ground-based data were temporally matched, and only dates with valid observations from both sources were included. Satellite values were extracted from the pixel closest to the monitoring station and compared with corresponding ground-based measurements. Agreement was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (R) and coefficient of determination (R²). Given the differences between satellite-derived atmospheric column measurements and ground-level observations, the analysis focused on temporal association rather than direct numerical equivalence.
Correlation with Environmental and Anthropogenic Factors
Environmental and anthropogenic variables included elevation, land surface temperature (LST), vegetation cover, and road density. Elevation data were obtained from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) digital elevation model at 30 m resolution, LST from Landsat observations, and the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) from MODIS data, using Google Earth Engine. Road density was calculated through kernel density analysis in a GIS environment.
The environmental layers, pollutant variables, and CIAP were aligned to a consistent spatial framework. A regular sampling grid was established across the study area, and values were extracted at corresponding sampling locations. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated in RStudio to examine the direction and strength of relationships between pollutants, CIAP, and environmental and anthropogenic variables. Correlation strengths were interpreted using the Chaddock scale.

Results and Discussion
The results revealed substantial spatial, seasonal, and interannual variability in NO₂, SO₂, CO, and AAI across Kerman during 2018–2024, indicating differences in emission sources and environmental influences.
AAI varied considerably across years and seasons, with relatively high values around 2022 followed by some reduction. Higher values were frequently observed in central and peripheral areas, indicating spatial heterogeneity in aerosol-related conditions. NO₂ showed elevated values in areas associated with urban activities and transportation, with a noticeable decline in 2022. CO exhibited similar temporal variations, including a reduction around the same year, potentially associated with changes in human mobility and anthropogenic activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. These temporal patterns suggest that urban pollutant levels respond to both long-term development and short-term changes in human activity.
SO₂ displayed a distinct spatial pattern, with relatively high values in western and northwestern parts of the study area, where industrial and mining activities may contribute to emissions. Seasonal variations included relatively elevated levels during colder periods. Atmospheric stability, wind direction, and other meteorological conditions may influence the distribution and accumulation of this pollutant. Overall, areas in the western, northwestern, central, and eastern parts of Kerman frequently exhibited elevated pollutant levels. These patterns may reflect the combined effects of industrial and mining activities, traffic intensity, urban development, and atmospheric circulation.
The CIAP analysis provided an integrated assessment of relative pollution pressure across municipal areas. Zone 4 recorded the highest average CIAP value (approximately 0.773), accompanied by comparatively high NO₂ and CO values, whereas Zone 3 had the lowest average value (approximately 0.647). These differences identify areas with relatively greater and lower cumulative pollution pressure within the study area.
Validation against observations from the Moshtagh monitoring station for 2018–2022 yielded coefficients of determination (R²) ranging from approximately 0.185 to 0.279. Among the individual pollutants, SO₂ showed the highest reported correlation (R ≈ 0.52), whereas AAI showed the lowest (R ≈ 0.43). These results indicate modest agreement between satellite-derived and ground-based observations. The differences may reflect the distinct measurement characteristics of the datasets: Sentinel-5P provides atmospheric column information, whereas ground stations measure air quality near the surface. Differences in spatial representativeness, atmospheric conditions, and temporal matching may also affect the observed relationships. Therefore, satellite observations are best used alongside ground-based measurements rather than as their direct substitutes.
Correlation analysis highlighted associations between atmospheric pollutants and environmental and anthropogenic factors. Road density showed positive relationships with pollutants, particularly NO₂ and SO₂, suggesting an association between transportation intensity and pollution distribution. NO₂ and CO were also strongly positively correlated (r ≈ 0.79), indicating potentially related emission patterns. In contrast, vegetation cover and elevation generally showed negative relationships with several pollutants. Greater vegetation cover was associated with lower pollutant values, while elevation may influence pollution distribution through topographic and atmospheric processes. These associations emphasize the combined roles of transportation, industrial activities, vegetation, topography, and atmospheric circulation in shaping spatial pollution patterns across Kerman.
Overall, the findings indicate that air pollution in Kerman results from interactions among anthropogenic activities and environmental conditions. The spatial distribution of pollutants, differences in CIAP values, and observed relationships with environmental variables demonstrate the value of combining satellite observations, ground-based measurements, and GIS-based analysis for identifying relative pollution hotspots and supporting urban air-quality management.

Conclusion
This study demonstrated the value of integrating Sentinel-5P observations, ground-based measurements, GIS-based analysis, and composite indicators to assess urban air pollution in Kerman during 2018–2024. The analysis revealed substantial spatial, seasonal, and interannual variability in NO₂, SO₂, CO, and AAI. The observed reductions in NO₂ and CO around 2022 may be associated with changes in human mobility and anthropogenic activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Spatial analysis identified areas with relatively elevated pollution levels, particularly in zones influenced by industrial and mining activities, transportation networks, and urban development. The CIAP index further distinguished areas with different levels of relative cumulative pollution pressure, with Zone 4 recording the highest average value (0.773) and Zone 3 the lowest (0.647).
Validation against ground-based observations indicated modest agreement between satellite-derived and surface measurements, highlighting the importance of interpreting satellite data in conjunction with monitoring-station records. Correlation analysis also revealed positive associations between road density and selected pollutants, as well as a strong positive relationship between NO₂ and CO (r ≈ 0.79). Conversely, vegetation cover and elevation generally showed negative associations with several pollutants. These findings suggest that air pollution patterns in Kerman reflect the combined influence of anthropogenic activities and environmental conditions. However, the results should be interpreted as relative spatial and temporal patterns rather than direct assessments against health-based air-quality standards.
From an environmental management perspective, the findings support expanding ground-based monitoring, particularly in identified pollution hotspots, and strengthening the management of industrial and mining emissions. Improving public transportation and developing appropriate urban green infrastructure may also contribute to reducing local pollution pressure. Future research should incorporate additional monitoring stations, detailed meteorological variables, and advanced statistical or machine-learning models to improve the interpretation and prediction of pollutant distributions. The integrated framework applied in this study can support air-quality assessment and management in Kerman and other cities with limited monitoring infrastructure.

Funding
There is no funding support.

Authors’ Contribution
A. Rashki was responsible for conceptualization, designing the research methodology, formal analysis of satellite data, final editing, as well as supervision and executive management of the research.
S. Taleghani contributed to writing the original draft, data acquisition, validation of findings, data management, implementation of satellite image processing codes, and map visualization.

Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Air Pollution
Sulfur Dioxide (SO₂)
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO₂)
Remote Sensing
Sentinel-5P
  1. اسدی، مهدی؛ حاجی محمدی، حسن و کرمی، مختار . (1403). کاربرد شاخص‌های ناپایداری در پایش طوفان‌های تندری در استان کرمان. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 14(2)، 47-60. doi: 10.30488/gps.2021.143529.2855
  2. امیرتیموری، سمیه. (1392). بررسی تأثیر آلودگی هوا ناشی از فعالیت مجتمع مس سرچشمه بر بخش کشاورزی منطقه و برآورد میزان بهینه اجتماعی آن. پایان نامه دکتری تخصصی مهندسی کشاورزی، به راهنمایی صادق خلیلیان و مشاوره حمید امیرنژاد و علی محبی، دانشکده علوم کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
  3. تقی‌زاده دیوا، سیدعلی؛ سلمان ماهینی، عبدالرسول و فلاح لاجیمی، حمیدرضا . (1403). مدل‌سازی پیشران‌های ایجادکننده آلودگی هوا در شهر تهران. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 14(1)، 151-163. doi: 10.30488/gps.2023.406594.3662
  4. حبیبی، معصومه؛ ارشادی، طراوت و امیرسلیمانی، مینو. (1391). راهبرد مدیریت تراکم شهری و نقش آن در کاهش آلودگی هوای شهر. همایش ملی جریان و آلودگی هوا، تهران.
  5. حسن‌زاده، رضا. (1385). بررسی شرایط و مسائل زمین شناسی شهری کرمان با استفاده از سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی ‏‎(GIS).‎‏ پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد زمین شناسی، به راهنمایی احمد عباس‌نژاد، دانشکده علوم، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان.
  6. حسن‌زاده، نازنین؛ حسن زاده، رضا؛ حسینجانی زاده، مهدیه و هنرمند، مهدی. (1402). بررسی میزان تغییرات غلظت گازهای دی اکسید سولفور و دی اکسید نیتروژن موجود در هوای مناطق صنعتی با استفاده از سنجش ازدور و GIS - مطالعه موردی: کارخانه ذوب مس خاتون آباد، استان کرمان. فصلنامه اطلاعات جغرافیایی «سپهر»، 32(125)، 7-27. doi: 10.22131/sepehr.2023.559597.2896
  7. حیدری، محسن؛ حیدری نژاد، ضحی؛ علیپور، ولی؛ دیندارلو، کاووس؛ رحمانیان، امید؛ گودرزی، بابک و موسی پور، حسن. (1396). ارزیابی کیفیت هوا بر اساس شاخص کیفیت هوا در شهر کرمان در سال 1394. پژوهش در بهداشت محیط، 3(3)، 208-218.
  8. زمانی، سمیرا؛ محمودآبادی، مجید؛ یزدان پناه، نجمه و فرپور، محمدهادی. (1398). تحلیل فرسایندگی بادهای ایستگاه‎های سینوپتیک استان کرمان با استفاده از گل‎باد، گل‎طوفان و گل‎ماسه. مجله مدیریت خاک و تولید پایدار، 9(2)، 23-43. doi: 10.22069/ejsms.2019.14813.1810
  9. زینالی، بتول؛ ملانوری، الهام و صفری، شیوا. ( 1402). تحلیل زمانی و فضایی آلایندهای هوا در استان آذربایجان شرقی. جغرافیای طبیعی، 15(62)، 89-104.
  10. کرمی، محمد و دهقانی، محسن. (1398). ارزیابی اثرات زیست محیطی مجتمع مس سرچشمه با استفاده از روش ارزیابی پیامد با رویکرد ریسک. پنجمین همایش بین المللی مهندسی کشاورزی و محیط زیست با رویکرد توسعه پایدار، شیراز.
  11. محمدی تهرودی، مژده؛ افشار پور، مهدی؛ کاظمی تبار، سید محسن و نظری, نجمه. (1389). بررسی آلاینده های اصلی هوای ناشی از فعالیت صنایع مختلف در استان کرمان. سیزدهمین همایش ملی بهداشت محیط کرمان.
  12. ناجی، محمد؛ عزیزی، قاسم و کریمی، مصطفی. (1404). تغییرات زمانی و پراکنش فضایی شاخص ذرات معلق در دامنه جنوبی البرز مرکزی بر پایه داده‌های ماهواره‌ای. پژوهش های جغرافیای طبیعی، 57(2)، 1-18. doi: 10.22059/jphgr.2024.383803.1007845
  13. Abbasnejad, A., & Abbasnejad, B. (2019). Distribution, sources and pollution status of Pb in indoor and outdoor dusts of Kerman City, SE Iran. Environmental Forensics, 20(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2019.1566289
  14. Amirteimouri, S. (2013). Investigation of the impact of air pollution caused by the Sarcheshmeh Copper Complex on the agricultural sector of the region and estimation of its socially optimal level [Master's thesis, Tarbiat Modares University]. [In Persian]
  15. Asadi, M., Hajimohammadi, H., & Karami, M. (2024). Application of instability indices in monitoring thunderstorm events in Kerman Province. Journal of Spatial Planning Geography, 14(2), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2021.143529.2855 [In Persian]
  16. Bala, R., Yadav, V. P., Kumar, D. N., & Prasad, R. (2024). Exploring the relationship of land surface parameters and air pollutants with land surface temperature in different cities using satellite data. Advances in Space Research, 74(7), 2958–2975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.06.031
  17. Bauwens, M., Compernolle, S., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J. F., van Gent, J., Eskes, H., Levelt, P. F., van der A, R., Veefkind, J. P., Vlietinck, J., Yu, H., & Zehner, C. (2020). Impact of coronavirus outbreak on NO₂ pollution assessed using TROPOMI and OMI observations. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(11), e2020GL087978. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087978
  18. Botkin, D. B., & Keller, E. A. (2012). Environmental science. Wiley.
  19. Buchwitz, M., De Beek, R., Noël, S., Burrows, J. P., Bovensmann, H., Bremer, H., Heimann, M., et al. (2005). Carbon monoxide, methane and carbon dioxide columns retrieved from SCIAMACHY by WFM-DOAS: Year 2003 initial data set. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5(12), 3313–3329. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3313-2005
  20. Fuladlu, K., & Altan, H. (2021). Examining land surface temperature and relations with the major air pollutants: A remote sensing research in case of Tehran. Urban Climate, 39, 100958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100958
  21. Fuladlu, K., & Altan, H. (2022). Examination of the population density impact on major air pollutants: A study in the case of Germany. In Innovating strategies and solutions for urban performance and regeneration. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98187-7_16
  22. Ghahremanloo, M., Lops, Y., Choi, Y., & Mousavinezhad, S. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on air pollution levels in East Asia. Science of the Total Environment, 754, 142226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142226
  23. Gharibi, S., & Shayesteh, K. (2021). Application of Sentinel-5 satellite imagery in identifying air pollutant hotspots in Iran. Journal of Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards, 8(3), 123. https://doi.org/10.52547/jsaeh.8.3.123 [In Persian]
  24. Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864), 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195
  25. Grzywa-Celińska, A., Krusiński, A., & Milanowski, J. (2020). "Smoging kills": Effects of air pollution on the human respiratory system. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 27(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/110477
  26. Habibi, M., Arshadi, T., & Amirsoleimani, M. (2012). Urban density management strategy and its role in reducing urban air pollution. Proceedings of the National Conference on Air Flow and Air Pollution, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
  27. Hassanpour Matikolaei, S. A. H., Jamshidi, H., & Samimi, A. (2019). Characterizing the effect of traffic density on ambient CO, NO₂, and PM₂.₅ in Tehran, Iran: An hourly land-use regression model. Transportation Letters, 11(8), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1385201
  28. Hassanzadeh, N., Hassanzadeh, R., Hosseinjani Zadeh, M., & Honarmand, M. (2023). Investigation of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide concentration changes in industrial areas using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of the Khatunabad Copper Smelter, Kerman Province. Sepehr, 32(125), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2023.559597.2896 [In Persian]
  29. Hassanzadeh, R. (2006). Investigation of urban geological conditions and issues in Kerman using a geographic information system (GIS) [Master's thesis, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman]. [In Persian]
  30. Heidari, M., Heidarinejad, Z., Alipour, V., Dindarloo, K., Rahmanian, O., Goodarzi, B., & Mousapour, H. (2017). Evaluation of air quality based on the Air Quality Index in Kerman City in 2015. Journal of Research in Environmental Health, 3(3), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.22038/jreh.2018.26051.1173 [In Persian]
  31. Heidarinejad, Z., Kavosi, A., Mousapour, H., Daryabor, M. R., Radfard, M., & Abdolshahi, A. (2018). Data on evaluation of AQI for different season in Kerman, Iran, 2015. Data in Brief, 20, 1917–1923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.216
  32. Kaplan, G., & Yigit Avdan, Z. (2020). Space-borne air pollution observation from Sentinel-5P TROPOMI: Relationship between pollutants, geographical and demographic data. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 5(3), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.644089
  33. Karami, M., & Dehghani, M. (2019). Environmental impact assessment of the Sarcheshmeh Copper Complex using the impact assessment method with a risk approach. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Agricultural Engineering and Environment with a Sustainable Development Approach, Shiraz, Iran. [In Persian]
  34. Kazeminiya, A. (2017). Zoning of vulnerability of Kerman City buildings against earthquakes using GIS. Geospatial Engineering Journal, 8(3), 31–47. [In Persian]
  35. Kooreman, M. L., de Graaf, M., Stammes, P., et al. (2020). Effects of clouds on the UV absorbing aerosol index from TROPOMI. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 13, 6407–6422. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6407-2020
  36. Landgraf, J., aan de Brugh, J., Scheepmaker, R., Borsdorff, T., Hu, H., Houweling, S., ... & Hasekamp, O. (2016). Carbon monoxide total column retrievals from TROPOMI shortwave infrared measurements. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9(10), 4955–4975. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4955-2016
  37. Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D., & Pozzer, A. (2015). The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature, 525(7569), 367–371. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15371
  38. Manisalidis, I., Stavropoulou, E., Stavropoulos, A., & Bezirtzoglou, E. (2020). Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: A review. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014
  39. Mansouri, B., & Hamidian, A. H. (2013). Assessment of the air quality of Isfahan City, Iran, using selected air quality parameters. Iranian Journal of Toxicology, 7(21), 842–848.
  40. Maurya, N. K., Pandey, P. C., Sarkar, S., Kumar, R., & Srivastava, P. K. (2022). Spatio-temporal monitoring of atmospheric pollutants using Earth observation Sentinel-5P TROPOMI data: Impact of stubble burning—A case study. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(5), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11050301
  41. Mohammadi Tehrudi, M., Afshar Pour, M., Kazemi Tabar, S. M., & Nazari, N. (2010). Investigation of major air pollutants emitted from various industries in Kerman Province. Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Environmental Health, Kerman, Iran. [In Persian]
  42. Naji, M., Azizi, Q., & Karimi, M. (2025). Temporal changes and spatial distribution of the particulate matter index on the southern slopes of the Central Alborz based on satellite data. Physical Geography Research, 57(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2024.383803.1007845 [In Persian]
  43. Seinfeld, J. H., & Pandis, S. N. (2016). Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From air pollution to climate change (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  44. Shikwambana, L., Mhangara, P., & Mbatha, N. (2020). Trend analysis and first-time observations of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide in South Africa using TROPOMI/Sentinel-5P data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 91, 102130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102130
  45. Tabunschik, V., Gorbunov, R., & Gorbunova, T. (2023). Unveiling air pollution in Crimean mountain rivers: Analysis of Sentinel-5 satellite images using Google Earth Engine (GEE). Remote Sensing, 15(13), 3364. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133364
  46. Tabunschik, V., Gorbunov, R., Bratanov, N., Gorbunova, T., Mirzoeva, N., & Voytsekhovskaya, V. (2023). Fatala River Basin (Republic of Guinea, Africa): Analysis of current state, air pollution, and anthropogenic impact using geoinformatics methods and remote sensing data. Sustainability, 15(22), 15798. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215798
  47. Tabunshchik, V., Nikiforova, A., Lineva, N., Drygval, P., Gorbunov, R., Gorbunova, T., Kerimov, I., Pham, C. N., Bratanov, N., & Kiseleva, M. (2024). The dynamics of air pollution in the southwestern part of the Caspian Sea Basin (based on the analysis of Sentinel-5 satellite data utilizing the Google Earth Engine cloud-computing platform). Atmosphere, 15(11), 1371. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111371
  48. Taghizadeh Diva, S. A., Salmanmahiny, A., & Fallah Lajimi, H. (2024). Modeling the driving forces of air pollution in Tehran. Journal of Spatial Planning Geography, 14(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2023.406594.3662 [In Persian]
  49. Taha, H., Sailor, D. J., & Akbari, H. (1992). High-albedo materials for reducing building cooling energy use.
  50. Theys, N., De Smedt, I., Yu, H., Danckaert, T., van Gent, J., Hörmann, C., Wagner, T., Hedelt, P., Bauer, H., & Romahn, F. (2017). Sulfur dioxide retrievals from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor: Algorithm theoretical basis. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 10(1), 119–153. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-119-2017
  51. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2014). Air Quality Index (AQI): A guide to air quality and your health. https://www.airnow.gov
  52. Veefkind, J. P., Aben, I., McMullan, K., Förster, H., De Vries, J., Otter, G., et al. (2012). TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications. Remote Sensing of Environment, 120, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.027
  53. Verhoelst, T., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J. C., Eskes, H. J., Eichmann, K. U., ... Zehner, C. (2021). Ground-based validation of the Copernicus Sentinel-5P Tropomi NO₂ measurements with the Ndacc Zsl-Doas, Max-Doas and Pandonia global networks. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 14(1), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-481-2021
  54. Vîrghileanu, M., Săvulescu, I., Mihai, B. A., Nistor, C., & Dobre, R. (2020). Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) pollution monitoring with Sentinel-5P satellite imagery over Europe during the coronavirus pandemic outbreak. Remote Sensing, 12(21), 3575. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213575
  55. Voogt, J. A., & Oke, T. R. (2003). Thermal remote sensing of urban climates. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86(3), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00079-8
  56. Yousofpour, Y., Abolhassani, L., Hirabayashi, S., Burgess, D., Sabouni, M. S., & Daneshvarkakhki, M. (2024). Ecosystem services and economic values provided by urban park trees in the air polluted city of Mashhad. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105110
  57. Zamani, S., Mahmoudabadi, M., Yazdanpanah, N., & Farpour, M. (2019). Analysis of wind erosivity at synoptic stations in Kerman Province using wind rose, storm rose, and sand rose. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 9(2), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.22069/ejsms.2019.14813.181 [In Persian]
  58. Zeinali, B., Mollanouri, E., & Safari, S. (2023). Spatial and temporal analysis of air pollutants in East Azerbaijan Province. Physical Geography, 15(62), 89–104. [In Persian]
  59. Zheng, Z., Yang, Z., Wu, Z., & Marinello, F. (2019). Spatial variation of NO₂ and its impact factors in China: An application of Sentinel-5P products. Remote Sensing, 11(16), 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11161939