-Evaluating International Historical Geography Assessment of Maps on Three Iranian Islands: Abu Musa and Greater & Lesser Tunbs

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Abstract

Islands in the Persian Gulf and the Oman territory since ancient times until Nadir Shah and Karim Khan Zand have unquestioned dominance by the Iranian government. After this period, due to competition and constant efforts by the British colonial powers to override the rights of Iran in Persian Gulf and 67-year occupation of the islands of Greater and Lesser Tunb and Abu Musa by Britain and then restore them to our permanent sovereignty of our country, These islands have always been within Iranian territorial jurisdiction and also United Arab Emirates’ unfounded claims about them will not work. In addition to its authenticity and geographical maps confirmed the fact that Tunb and Abu Musa islands always belonged to Iran. ‘Marine maps’ prepared to guide sailors and ships in the 18th century, most of them were intercontinental. And they paid less attention to the social and political aspects, Persian Gulf islands also were divided into two parts: Persian and Arabic which three Iranian islands of Abu Musa, Greater and Lesser Tunb were always in Iran. These maps and marine In terms of history, authenticity and credibility in the field of international relations today, and documentation are also paid and invoked. This study intends to outline the function of the International maps and marine, particularly the status of the strategic plan of the British War Department about Iran and three Iranian islands in the Persian Gulf are expressed in 1886. A crucial question is whether this studies because evidence to substantiate the prestigious international nautical maps and land rights in the three islands of Greater and Lesser Tunb and Abu Musa there?
 

Keywords

References

  1. خاطرات نورتکوت ایلی [تبعه­ انگلیس] مشاور حقوقی شیخ خالد حاکم شارجه در سال­های 1970 تا 1972، صفحات 5 تا 7.
  2. طبرسا، نقی. 1387. حاکمیت بر جزایر ابوموسی، تنب کوچک و تنب بزرگ در روند سیاست خارجی ایران، مرکز اسناد و تاریخ دیپلماسی وزارت امور خارجه.
  3. طبرسا، نقی. 1390. جزایر سه­گانه­ی ایرانی در خلیج فارس، پژوهشی تاریخی حقوقی. مؤسسه­ی مطالعات و تحقیقات بین­المللی ابرار معاصر تهران.
  4. گزارش شماره­ 36/201 مورخ 7/11/1349 اداره­ نهم سیاسی  وزارت امور خارجه به نقل از نقشه­های دریایی سال­های 1712-1704-1716-1728-1758-1765-1785-1797-1787-1789.
  5. مجموعه «روابط‌ ایران‌ و انگلیس‌ در خلیج‌ فارس‌، یادداشت‌ها و مکاتبات‌ دولت بریتانیا مربوط‌ به‌ جزایر خلیج‌ فارس‌ از  1928 تا 1934». 1383. تهران، مرکز اسناد و خدمات‌ پژوهشی وزارت امور خارجه.
  6. نامه­ وزارت خارجه ایران به کاردار انگلیس در تاریخ 20 اوت‌ 1928 به شماره P/4509/ 1928_254(آر).
    1. Latin Words & Phrases for Lawyers, 1980. Law and Business Publications Canada, Inc.
    2. Lights and Record Book of the Survey of Persian Gulf by Capitain Haine, 1829.
    3. Lorimer, J.C. 1915. Gazetteer of the Persian Gulf, Oman and Central Arabia IIB, Historical, (Calcutta superintendent Government printed India; published in 1970 by Gregg International Publishers Ltd, West mead, England). 1: 1 A,

10. Marquis of Salisbury, 1888. Enclosing map of Persia to Mr Wolf, No. 64. Public Records Library.

11. Memorandum on The new map of Persia by the Hon, George Curzon, 1892. Vol. XIV.

12. Trigonometrically Survey Made by Order of the United English East Indian co. 1830. by George Barnes Brucks, Commander. H.C. marine.

13. Wolf, 21 Aug., 1888. To Mr Marquis of Salisbury, No. 160. Public Records Library.

14. Wolf, 22 Aug., 1888. Enclosing Map of Persia, No. 105. Public Records Library.

15. Wolf, 22 July, 1888. Enclosing Map of Persia. Public Records Library.

16. Wolf, 7 Sept., 1888. To Mr Marquis of Salisbury, No. 176. Public Records Library.

Geographical Planning of Space
Volume 4, Issue 12 - Serial Number 12
September 2014
Pages 39-52

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics