ابعاد پایه موثر بر آمایش دفاعی کشورهای خاورمیانه

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه جغرافیا، دانشکده ادبیات دکتر علی شریعتی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران

2 گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه مالک اشتر، تهران، ایران

چکیده

تحولاتی نظیر جهانی‌شدن، پیوستگی فضاهای جغرافیایی و همچنین تحولات صورت گرفته در عرصه فناوری‌های نظامی ، مسئله دفاع را به‌عنوان عامل اصلی بقاء کشورها دچار دگرگونی کرده است. چرا که تحول از جنگ سخت به‌سوی جنگ نرم و سپس جنگ هوشمند در طی دهه‌های اخیر، رویکردها نسبت به دفاع را متفاوت نموده است.این تحولات سبب توسعه بحث‌ها پیرامون آمایش دفاعی شده است. در این میان کشورهای خاورمیانه به‌واسطه شرایط خاص خود از نظر دفاعی اهمیت و جایگاه برجسته‌ای دارند. در مقاله حاضر با روش توصیفی و تحلیلی و با استفاده از یافته‌های کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی و با نرم‌افزار Smart PLS تلاش شده است ابعاد پایه‌ای موثر بر آمایش دفاعی کشورهای خاورمیانه را موردبررسی قرار دهد. نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان‌دهنده آن است که مؤلفه‌های موثر در تحقیق حاضر شامل 130 مورد است که در قالب 15 بُعد قرار می‌گیرند. اهمیت این ابعاد در آمایش دفاعی کشورهای خاورمیانه به ترتیب عبارت‌اند از بعد ژئوپلیتیکی با امتیاز 43/0، بعد نظامی با امتیاز41/0، بعد اقتصادی با امتیاز 41/0، بعد سیاسی با امتیاز 39/0، بعد هیدرولوژی با امتیاز 34/0، بعد امنیتی با امتیاز 32/.، بعد اجتماعی با امتیاز 29/0، بعد جمعیتی با امتیاز 28/0، بعد فرهنگی با امتیاز 26/0، بعد علمی-بهداشتی با امتیاز 25/0، بعد ژئومورفولوژی با امتیاز 25/0، بعد ریاضی با امتیاز 2/0، بعد اقلیمی با امتیاز 2/0، بعد زیستی با امتیاز 2/0و بعد خاکی با امتیاز 18/0 می‌باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Basic dimensions affecting the defense of Middle East countries

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Zangoei Dovom 1
  • mohsen janparvar 1
  • Akbar Heydari 1
  • Ali Mohamadpour 2
1 Department of Geography, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
2 Department of Political Geography, Malik Ashtar University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
Transformations such as globalization, the contiguity of geographical spaces, as well as developments in the field of military technologies have transformed the issue of defense as the main factor for the survival of countries. Because the transformation from hard to soft war and then the smart war in recent decades has changed the approaches to defense. These transformations have led to the development of discussions about defense purposes. Meanwhile, Middle East countries have a prominent position and importance in terms of defense due to their special conditions. This article has tried to investigate the basic dimensions affecting the defense of foreign countries with descriptive and analytical methods, using library and field findings and Smart-PLS software. The results of the current research show that the effective components in the current research include 130 items that are placed in the form of 15 dimensions. The importance of these dimensions in defense of the Middle East countries is, respectively, geopolitical dimension with a 0.43 score, military dimension with a 0.41 score, economic dimension with a 0.41 score, political dimension with a 0.39 score, hydrology dimension with a 0.34 score, security dimension with a 0.32 score, social dimension with a 0.29 score, demographic dimension with a 0.28 score, cultural dimension with a 0.26 score, scientific-health dimension with a 0.25 score, geomorphological dimension with a 0.25 score, mathematical dimension with a 0.2 score, climatic dimension with a 0.2 score, biological dimension with a 0.2 score and soil dimension with a 0.18 score.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Security and defense are among the most vital issues for the preservation and survival of countries. In fact, defense and military affairs are necessary for countries' independence and political, cultural and economic development. Among them, geography and political geography are prominent fields that directly affect defense issues. Actions taken by a country in dimensions (political, military, economic, etc.) in order to maintain security and territorial integrity, guarantee independence and protection of its people against any enemy attack, will organize the geographical (spatial) environment, wise and appropriate distribution of critical places and sensitive centers and infrastructures are identified by taking into account the threats and the correct use of environmental capacities in political, economic, social, cultural, etc. dimensions, and as a result, it can lead to stability and stability in the country's geographical space.
The design of defense planning model according to the economic, cultural, political and environmental features in the new era when countries are facing external and internal threats as a sub-branch of territorial planning has received the attention and importance of officials and governance systems in order to be able to reduce these threats with accurate and systematic planning in the geographical space, defense planning is not separate from the flow of national and regional planning. It is important to pay attention to it based on the type and amount of external and internal threats to governance. Due to the expansion of the security circle, the government is not only responsible for creating military security. However, it must also exercise part of its authority in the direction of territorial management. On the other hand, there has been a transformation in the form of threats and wars based on changes and the movement from hard to soft war and finally, smart war is the basis for reviewing and recognizing the components that can be used in defense of countries, including the Middle East countries, have a prominent position and importance. Despite the internal differences between countries, the Middle East has commonalities and connections that can directly affect the overall defense of this geographical space.
 
Methodology
In terms of type and purpose, the current research is fundamentally applied. Also, it is descriptive and analytical in terms of nature. This research, in addition to the correct and realistic depiction of the defense situation of the Middle East countries, it is tried to provide a suitable model for the defense of the countries. The sources used in the current research are library and field sources (questionnaires). According to the subject of the current research, the statistical population of this research is a collection of people, experts and elites who have sufficient knowledge, experience and expertise regarding the research topic, which is the design of the defense model, according to the nature of the Delphi pattern model, at least the statistical population based on the sources should be between twenty and fifty people to reach statistical saturation.
The number of selected samples included 51 people who were identified in the form of a non-random sampling pattern and introduced as a statistical sample in the framework of the Delphi model. Due to the qualitative nature of this research, it has been tried to use the Delphi model in the framework of the targeted non-random model. Therefore, based on these cases, the current research has selected the maximum statistical population of 51 elites, experts, and opinionated people in this field. In this research, to evaluate the research hypotheses in the form of the hardness equations model, the partial least squares method and the SMART-PLS software, which is a variance-based path modeling technique and provides the possibility of checking the theory and metrics simultaneously, have been exerted.
 
Results and discussion
In this research, approaches such as political, military, cultural, etc., in the field of land use have been discussed. In the meantime, the defense of countries as an emerging approach is significant. According to the developments in geographical spaces, such as the evolution of military-defense technologies, the connection of geographical spaces to each other and most importantly, the movement from hard and soft war to smart war has witnessed a transformation and wide attention in a way that countries are suited to these developments are trying to prepare the geographical space of their country in terms of defense. Therefore, the defense planning of the Middle East countries as a geographical region has great importance from a geopolitical and strategic point of view, which indicates that the countries of this region face threats and complex defense-security issues in different ways.
 
Conclusion
The results of the present research show that the defense planning in developing countries should be considered according to their characteristics, considering all 15 dimensions, which include 130 components. In the design of the defense planning of these countries, attention should be paid to the weight and importance of the shaping dimensions. In general, it can be said that the defense planning of the Middle East countries is proportional to the geographical features of these countries and on the other hand, considering the developments in the field of threats and moving from hard to smart war, 15 dimensions should be considered for the defense of these countries.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Military Defense Security Middle East Countries
  1. برژنیسکی، زبیگنیو. (1381). خارج از کنترل اغتشاش جهانی در طلیعة قرن بیست و یکم. ترجمه عبدالرحیم نوه ابراهیم. تهران: انتشارات اطلاعات.
  2. تاجیک، محمدرضا. (1381). مقدمه ای بر استراتژی های امنیت ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. جلد اول رهیافت ها و راهبردها، تهران: فرهنگ گفتمان.
  3. حافظ نیا، محمدرضا. (1385). اصول و مفاهیم ژئوپلیتیک. مشهد: انتشارات پاپلی.
  4. دلیر، اسمعیل؛ معصومی، محمد تقی و صمدزاده، رسول. (1401). آمایش فضایی مناطق شهری اردبیل با معیارهای شهر اصیل اسلامی. فصلنامه آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 12(1)، 133-115.  doi:10.30488/GPS.2022.309531.3460
  5. زالی، نادر. (۱۳۸۵). جایگاه آمایش سرزمین در نظام برنامه‌ریزی کشور. ماهنامه تعامل، 4 (2)، 12-1.
  6.  صالحی امیری، سیدرضا. (1385). مدیریت منازعات قومی در ایران. تهران: انتشارات مرکز تحقیقات استراتژیک.
  7. صفوی، سید یحیی. (1381). جغرافیای نظامی. تهران: انتشارات سازمان جغرافیایی نیروهای مسلح.
  8. صمدی، رضا؛ خاکپور، براتعلی؛ رهنما، محمدرحیم و خوارزمی، امیدعلی. (1400). برنامه‌ریزی و راهبردهای تحقق شهر شبانه در کلانشهر مشهد با تأکید بر شاخص‌های سرزندگی شهری. فصلنامه آمایش جغرافیایی فض، 11 (41)، 22-1. Doi:10.30488/GPS.2020.110898
  9. علی‌پور، عباس و باقری، سیدسجاد. (1395). بررسی نقش ویژگی ژئومورفولوژیکی در دفاع از مناطق مرزی و تعیین خطوط دفاعی بر اساس آن؛ (مطالعه موردی: منطقه عمومی سرپل ذهاب در غرب استان کرمانشاه)، فصلنامه جغرافیای نظامی و امنیتی، 1 (2)، 26-5.
  10. عندلیب، علیرضا. (1380). نظریه‌های پایه و اصول آمایش مناطق مرزی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. تهران: انتشارات دوره عالی جنگ.
  11. قریب، فریدون. (1372). شبکه ارتباطی در طراحی شهری. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  12. کاظمی، احمد. (1384). امنیت در قفقاز جنوبی. تهران: انتشارات ابرار معاصر.
  13. کرمی، جهانگیر. (1400). فرهنگ و امنیت ملی روسیه. فصلنامه سیاست دفاعی، 13 (49)، 150-127.  Dor:  20.1001.1.10255087.1400.30.116.5.5
  14. کمپ، جفری و هارکاوی، رابرت. (1383). جغرافیای استراتژیک خاورمیانه. ترجمه سید مهدی حسینی متین. جلد اول. تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
  15. کوهن، سائول برنارد. (1387). ژئوپلیتیک نظام جهانی. ترجمه عباس کاردان، تهران: انتشارات موسسه فرهنگی مطالعات و تحقیقات بین­المللی ابرار معاصر.
  16. گروه امنیت ملی پژوهشکده علوم دفاعی. (1379). جنگ‌ آینده‌ در دکترین‌ نظامی‌ رژیم‌ صهیونیستی.‌ فصلنامه سیاست دفاعی، 8 (4)، 82-69.
  17. لطیفیان، سعیده. (1376). استراتژی و روش های برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک. تهران: انتشارات وزارت امور خارجه.
  18. نوروزی، محمدنقی. (1385). فرهنگ دفاعی ـ امنیتی. تهران: نشر سنا.
  19. هاگت، پیتر. (1391). جغرافیا ترکیبی نو. جلد دوم. ترجمه شاپور گودرزی نژاد. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
  20. Alipour, A., & Bagheri, S.S. (2016). Investigating the role of geomorphological feature in border areas and determining defense lines based on it (case study: Sarpol-e Zahab general area in the west of Kermanshah province). Journal of Military and Security Geography, 1(2), 5-26.[in Persian]
  21. Andalib, A. (2001). Basic theories and principles of the border regions of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: great period of war Publications. [in Persian]
  22. Ashley, R. (1980). The Political Economy of War and Peace. London: Francis Pinter
  23. Brzenieski, Z, (2002). Out of Control: Global Turmoil on the Eve of the 21st Century. Translated by Abdul Rahim, naveh Ibrahim.Tehran: Information Publications.[in Persian]
  24. Cohen, S.B. (2008). Geopolitics of the world system. Translated by Abbas Kardan, Tehran: Abrar Moaser Publications. [in Persian]
  25. Cohen, S. B. (1994). Geopolitics in New World Era, Recordin the World. Edited by G.Y.Demko and W.B.Wood. Westview Press, USA.7)
  26. Collins, J. M. (1998). Military Geography: For Professionals and the Public.
  27. Coogan, T.P. (1996). The Troubles: Ireland's Ordeal1966-1996. Boulder, CO:
    Roberts Rinehart.
  28. Dalir, I., Masoumi M. T., & Samadzadeh, R. (2022). Evaluation of the Spatial Planning of Ardabil Urban Areas in accordance with the Criteria of the Original Islamic City. Geographical planning of space quarterly journal 12 (1), 115-133. doi:10.30488/GPS.2022.309531.3460 [in Persian]
  29. Fredrick, H. (2005). Hard and Soft Power: The Paradox of Winning the War of Ideas in the 21st Century. US Army War College.
  30. Gharib, F. (1993). Communication network in urban design of Tehran. Tehran University Press. [in Persian]
  31. Goletsis, Y., & Chletsos, M. (2011). Measurement of development and regional disparities in Greek periphery: A multivariate approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45(3), 174-18.
  32. Haas, E B., & Schmitter, P. C. (1964). Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections about Unity in Latin America. International Organization,  18 (4), 705-737.
  33. Hafeznia, M.R. (2006). Principles and concepts of geopolitics. Mashhad: Papoli­ Publications[in Persian]
  34. Haggett, p. (2001). Geography a Modern Synthesis. pearson Education limited, Edinburgh Gate: prntice Hall.
  35. Hoggett, P. (2012). Geography a Modern synthesis. second volume, translated by Shapur Guderzinejad, Tehran: Samt Publications.
  36. Homer-Dixon, T. (1994). Environmental Scarcities and violent conflict: Evidence from Cases. International Security, 19(1), 5-40.
  37. Karmi, J. (2013). Russian culture and national security. Defense Policy Quarterly. 13th year, number 49, Tehran, Defense Sciences Research Institute, Imam Hossein University.[in Persian]
  38. Kazemi, A. (2005). Security in the South Caucasus. Tehran: Abrar Moaser Publications.[in Persian]
  39. 21)Kemp, G., & Robert, H. (2004). Strategic Geography of the Middle East. Translated by Seyyed Mahdi Hosseini Matin, Volume 1, Tehran: Research Center for Strategic Studies Publications. [in Persian]
  40. Lahneman William, J. (2003). Changing Power Cycles and Foreign Policy Role-power Realignments: Asia, Europe, and North America, First Published January 1, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512103024001006
  41. Latifian, S. (1997). Strategy and strategic planning methods. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publications. [in Persian]
  42. National Security Group (2000). The future war in the military doctrine of the Zionist regime. Defense Policy Quarterly, 8(4), 1-12. [in Persian]
  43. Nazli, Ch., & North, R. (1975). Nations in Conflict: National Growth and
    International Violence. Sanfrancisco. Califi Freeman.
  44. Nowrozi, M. N. (2006). defense-security dictionary. Tehran: Sena Publishing. [in Persian]
  45. Richardson, L. F. (1960). Statistics of Deadly Quarrels. Boxwood Press, Pittsburgh Pa.; Quadrangle Books, Chicago cago, IllScience 30 December 1960: Vol. 132 no. 3444 pp. 1931-1932 . DOI: 10.1126/science.132.3444.1931-a.
  46. Safavi, S.Y. (2002). Military geography. Tehran: Geographical Organization of the Armed Forces Publications. [in Persian]
  47. Salehi Amiri, S. R. (2006). Management of ethnic conflicts in Iran. Tehran: Strategic Research Center Publications. [in Persian]
  48. Samadi, R., Khakpour, B., Rahnama, M. R. & Kharazmi, O. A. (2021). planning and strategies for the realization of the night city in Mashhad metropolis with an emphasis on urban vitality indicators, 11 (41), 1-22. [in Persian]
  49. Tajik, M. Z. (2002). An introduction to the national security strategies of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The first volume of approaches and strategies, Tehran, Farhang Gofteman Publications. [in Persian]
  50. Zali, N. (2006). the position of land use in the country's planning system: interaction. Interact Monthly, 4(2), 1-12. [in Persian].