Geographical planning of space quarterly journal

Geographical planning of space quarterly journal

Causal Explanation of the Obstacles and Challenges of Establishing Integrated Regional Governance in Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Department of Human Geography and Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
A B S T R A C T
The causal explanation of the obstacles and challenges of establishing integrated regional governance and determining the key factor of these challenges in integrated spatial management; this research is exploratory in finding processes and key factors. The grounded theory method was used to identify the key factors that are challenging in implementing integrated governance in the region. A specialized panel of 15 people was used for this purpose. The political economy of rent is considered a key factor determining the numerous obstacles and challenges in creating integrated regional governance in Iran. The application of the political economy of rent leads to the dominance of the national structure of governance over the regional structure and has not been able to institutionalize collaborative approaches involving all governmental, public, private, and non-governmental sectors and institutions. Therefore, as a changeable and unifying socio-spatial process managed by the public sector, spatial management was set as a benchmark. Regional governance is seen as a worthy institutional platform for the manifestation of plural power. In terms of the obstacles and challenges to its establishment, this powerful institutional platform is explained on the basis of two key concepts of political economy and institutionalism. Spatial management through the design of institutional-legal, economic, and environmental mechanisms, the education system reform, and the culture reform led to the establishment of integrated regional governance. However, this establishment takes place within the framework and context of an institutionalist political economy with a flexible, open, and integrated structure
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The discovery of effective knowledge in regional management using dispersed data from the experiences of different countries and managers is significant to achieving the goals of regional governance. When scattered data is collected, processed, and managed, practical knowledge and deep insights can be gained into the regional governance system. In Iran, the existence of different and partial models of the country's administrative system has led to diversity in the type of approach and system of spatial management. The administrative system of the regions has a minimum of systematic structures suitable for the regions' current needs. This study aims "to explain the obstacles and challenges in the implementation of integrated regional administration and to identify the key factors of these challenges in integrated spatial administration."
 
Methodology
The approach of the present study is qualitative and was conducted using the grounded theory method. The grounded theory method is qualitative research in which a theory is developed based on a data series. The grounded data theory method is usually implemented in three ways: the systematic, emergent, and constructivist methods. A systematic method was used to analyze the data in this study. The systematic method has three main steps as open coding, second step as centralised coding, third step as selective coding. The statistical population of this study includes experts and managers of ministries at the macro and micro levels, selected by the snowball method (chain reference). In this study, 15 people were interviewed. The in-depth interviews were introduced with questions on the "obstacles and challenges to the introduction of integrated regional governance," the remaining questions were based on the interviewees' answers.
 
Results and discussion
When explaining the obstacles and challenges to the introduction of integrated regional governance during the in-depth interviews, respondents considered the existence of a rent-seeking political economy as a key factor in these obstacles. The rent-seeking political economy leads to the government implementing its plans without consulting social groups and without considering issues such as efficiency and cost-effectiveness. In such an environment, rentier governments adopt an import substitution policy based on historical experience. Applying the rentier political economy approach leads to the dominance of the national management structure over the regional structure. On the other hand, the experience of the world and the country has shown that the state-oriented approach in regional development planning and management is not effective. The participatory approaches in which all state, public, private, and popular departments and institutions are institutionalized to participate with each other and the country's planning and management system, with its centralized and state-oriented features, do not have an efficient mechanism to seek the participation of non-state sectors and citizens.
 
Conclusion
The findings of the text crystallise a sectoral administration, a limited, non-dense system, a political-administrative centralism, a polar spatial pattern, the presence of all kinds of departments, an incoherent and divergent spatial structure, the neglect of socio-cultural construction, the weakness in the creation of regional institutions, the neglect of the creation of regional identity and ecological instability and the creation of supercritical conditions in the regions, the rentier political economy with an inflexible, closed, divergent and dispersed structure. Considering these obstacles and challenges in creating integrated regional governance in Iran, spatial management creates integrated regional governance through the development of institutional-legal, economic, and environmental mechanisms, education system reform, and culture reform. However, this establishment will occur in the text and the context of an institutionalist political economy with a flexible, open, and integrated structure.
In other words, when spatial organization manifests as a central category in which the political economy believes. The process of introducing integrated regional governance is based on the political economy's belief in the introduction of spatial management. Therefore, the strategy that forms the link between these concepts is the approach of integration in all dimensions. The integration approach with coordination, cooperation, and collaboration can bring the planned mechanisms to fruition.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Acharya, A. (2007). The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics. World Politics 59(4), 629-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/wp.2008.0000
  2. Akhundi, A., & Barakpour, N. (2010). Strategies for establishing a governance system in the Tehran metropolitan area. Rahbord, 19(57), 297–324. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.10283102.1389.18.4.9.0[in persian].
  3. Akhundi, A., Barakpour, N., Asadi, I., Basirat, M., & Taherkhani, H. (2008). Pathology of urban governance model in Iran. Geographical Research, 40(63), 135–156. [in persian].
  4. Albrechts, L., Healey, P., & Klaus, R. K. (2003). Strategic Spatial Planning and Regional Governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), 113-129. DOI: 10.1080/01944360308976301
  5. Alian, M., Razavian, M. T., Esmailzadeh, H., Fani, Z., & Faraji Rad, K. (2018). Application of game theory in analyzing stakeholders of metropolitan area management. Spatial Planning and Development, 22(4), 55–85. [in persian].
  6. Asadi, I. (2015). Explaining the necessity of establishing a special management and governance system for Tehran metropolitan area. Journal of Fine Arts – Architecture and Urban Planning, 21(1), 5–16. [in persian].
  7. Asgari, H. (2004). Designing an integrated management system for urban agglomerations in Iran. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University Economic Research Institute. [in persian].
  8. Ashnavar, H., Vashghani Farahani, E., & Rabieifard, A. (2021). Study of barriers and contextual challenges facing urban governance and management in Iran. Geography and Human Relations, 4(3), 18–31. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26453851.1400.4.3.2.8[in persian].
  9. Azar, A., Alvani, S. M., & Danaeefard, H. (2004). Qualitative research methodology in management: A comprehensive approach. Tehran: Safar-Eshraghi Publishing. [in persian].
  10. Bartley, T. (2018). Transnational corporations and global governance. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053540
  11. Buchinger, B., Johannes, J., & Bettina, K. (2008). Regionale Governance in der Centrope Region: Zwischen Wettbewerbsorientierung und Allgemeinwohl, in: Wirtschaft und Management, Schriftenreihe zur wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Forschung und Praxis der Fachhochschule des BFI Wien, Band 9, 9-27
  12. Erblin B., Giancarlo C., Umberto, J. R. & Alys, S. (2021). Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development: a European typology. European Planning Studies, 29(1), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295
  13. Fawcett, L. & Serrano, M. (eds) (2005). Regionalism and Governance in the Americas. Continental Drift. Basingstoke: Palgrave
  14. Garlick, S. (1997). Regional economic development: new partnership challenges for local government. In Dollery, B. and Marshall, N. (eds) Australian Local Government: Reform and Renewal. MacMillan Education, Melbourne, 276–293.
  15. Goertz, G., & Powers, K. (2014). "Regional Governance: the Evolution of a New Institutional Form", Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB). https://hdl.handle.net/10419/103311
  16. Goertz, G., & Powers, K. (2014). Regional governance: The evolution of a new institutional form, WZB Discussion Paper. No. SP IV 2014-106, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin https://hdl.handle.net/10419/103311
  17. Grigorescu, A. (2020). The ebb and flow of global governance: Intergovernmentalism versus nongovernmentalism in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Hänggi, H., Roloff, R. & Rüland, J. (2006). Interregionalism: A new phenomenon in international relations. In: H. Hänggi, R. Roloff and J. Rüland, eds., Interregionalism and international relations. London: Routledge, pp. 3–14.
  19. Hatami Nejad, H., & Vincent, N. Y. (2025). Barriers to the realization of integrated management and futures studies of good regional governance in Tehran County. Spatial Planning Geography Journal, 14(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2024.436271.3721[in persian].
  20. Haughton, G., Beer, A. & Maude, A. (2003). Understanding international convergence and divergence in local and regional economic development. In Beer, A., Haughton, G. and Maude, A. (eds) Developing Locally. Policy Press, Bristol, 15–36. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781847425812.003
  21. Healey, P. (2007). Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. Routledge, London.
  22. Hoffman, A. M. (2006). Building Trust: Overcoming Suspicion in International Conflict. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  23. Janin Rivolin, U. (2012). Planning systems as institutional technologies: A proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 63–85. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.661181
  24. Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism and urban governance: a state theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34, 452–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00250
  25. Joudaki, H. R., & Ghasempour, A. (2021). Challenges of integrated urban management governance and practical solutions. Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 5(16), 1–15. [in persian].
  26. Katzenstein, P. (2005). A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  27. Kazemian, G., & Mirabedini, Z. (2011). Pathology of integrated urban management in Tehran from a policy-making perspective. Journal of Fine Arts – Architecture and Urban Planning, 46, 27–38. [in persian].
  28. Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
  29. Keohane, Robert O. & Joseph, S. N. (1975). “International Interdependence and Integration.” In Handbook of Political Science, edited by Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby, 363-414. Andover: Addison-Wesley.
  30. Lalehpoor, M., Sarvar, H., & Sarvar, R. (2011). Spatial management and planning of metropolitan areas in the age of global economic integration with emphasis on Tehran metropolitan area. Environmental Planning, 13, 67–90. [in persian].
  31. Matouf, S. (1997). A look at bioregionalism theory and its applicability in regional planning in Iran. Budget and Planning Journal (Management and Planning Organization of Iran), 2(15), 47–58. [in persian].
  32. Mazza, L. (2015). Planning and citizenship. London: Routledge.
  33. Nadalutti, E. (2019). To what extent does governance change because of sub-regional cooperation? The analysis of Iskandar-Malaysia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Volume 19, 1–31. doi: 10.1093/irap/lcw022
  34. Nau, H.R. (1979). From Integration to Independence: Gains, Losses and Continuing Gaps. International Organization, 79(4), 119-147
  35. Orsini, A. (2020). Complex systems and international governance. International Studies Review,22(4), 1008–1038. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz005
  36. Panke, D., & Stapel, S. (2024). Multi - level governance. Handbook of Regional Cooperation and Integration, Edited by Philippe De Lombaerde. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800373747.00028
  37. Panke, D., Lang, S. & Wiedemann, A. (2017). State and regional actors in complex governance systems. Exploring dynamics of international negotiations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(1), 91–112 https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116669904
  38. Parhizkar, A., & Kazemian, G. (2005). Urban governance approach and its necessity in Tehran metropolitan management. Research in Growth and Sustainable Development (Economic Research), 5(16), 29–50. [in persian].
  39. Riggirozzi, P. (2012). Region, Regionness and Regionalism in Latin America: Towards a New Synthesis. New Political Economy, 17 (4), 421-443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.603827
  40. Sarrafi, M. (1998). Decentralization of metropolitan areas in the Global South: Beliefs and strategies. Architecture and Urbanism, (48–49), 33–45. [in persian].
  41. Sarrafi, M., & Nejati, N. (2014). New regionalism approach to improving spatial development management in Iran. Human Geography Research, 46(4), 857–874. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2015.51221[in persian].
  42. Schimmelfennig, F. (2006). Politisches Gestalten im erweiterten Europa: Ordnungsmodelle der Regional Governance. In D. Senghaas & M. Roth (eds), Global Governance für Entwicklung und Frieden (pp. 154–173). Bonn: Dietz.
  43. Scholte, J.A. (2021). Beyond institutionalism: Toward a transformed global governance theory.International Theory, 13(1), 179–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000421
  44. Seifoddini, F., & Panahandehkhah, M. (2010). Challenges and barriers to regional development in Iran. Human Geography Research, 42(73), 83–98. [in persian].
  45. Sheikhi, M. (2001). Regional planning in Iran (1981–2001): Necessities, trends, and challenges. Urban Management, 2(6), 18–25. [in persian].
  46. Söderbaum, F. (2004). Modes of Regional Governance in Africa: Neoliberalism, Sovereignty Boosting, and Shadow Networks. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 10(4), 419–436.
  47. Söderbaum, F. (2005). The international political economy of regionalism. In: N. Phillips, ed, Globalizing international political economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 221–245.
  48. Sojoudi, M., Ziyari, K., Pourahmad, A., & Yasouri, M. (2022). Evaluation of national, regional, and provincial plans based on regional approach (Case study: Plans of Gilan Province in Region 1 of territorial planning). Journal of Territorial Planning, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.22059/jtcp.2022.333128.670269[in persian].
  49. Taghvai, A. A., & Tajdar, R. (2009). An introduction to good urban governance: An analytical approach. Urban Management, 7(23), 45–58. [in persian].
  50. Zelli, F., Gerrits, L., & Möller, I. (2021). Global governance in complex times: Exploring new concepts and theories on institutional complexity. Complexity, Governance and Networks, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.173
  51. Ziyari, K. (2014). Principles and methods of regional planning. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in persian].
  52. Ziyari, K., & Mohammadi, A. (2017). Regional development management with emphasis on Iran (2nd ed.). Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in persian].
  53. Ziyari, K., Goodarzvand Chegeni, R., & Hosseinkhani, H. (2025). Designing a regional integrated governance establishment model in Iran. Journal of Territorial Planning, 16(2), 223–237.