مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا

مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا

تحلیل مؤلفه‌های شهر دوستدار زنان، مطالعه موردی: شهر اردبیل

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران
چکیده
در بسیاری از کشورهای درحال‌توسعه مانند ایران، زنان با چالش‌های متعددی در استفاده از فضاهای شهری مواجه هستند. این مسائل شامل عدم دسترسی کافی به فضاهای ایمن، کمبود امکانات و محدودیت‌های فرهنگی - اجتماعی است که حضور و مشارکت آن‌ها را در محیط‌های شهری کاهش می‌دهد. این پژوهش باهدف ارزیابی وضعیت شهر اردبیل از منظر مؤلفه‌های "شهر دوستدار زنان" انجام شد. روش تحقیق توصیفی - تحلیلی و به‌صورت پیمایشی بود و داده‌ها از طریق پرسش‌نامه محقق ساخته جمع‌آوری شد. جامعه آماری شامل ۳۸۴ زن از شهر اردبیل بود که با استفاده از فرمول کوکران و نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون t تک نمونه‌ای در SPSS و مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری (SEM) و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی (CFA) در AMOS استفاده گردید. نتایج نشان داد که وضعیت شاخص‌های شش‌گانه مرتبط با شهر دوستدار زنان در اردبیل نامطلوب بوده و زیر سطح متوسط (عدد مرجع ۳)، کیفیت قرار دارد. همچنین، نتایج تحلیل مسیر در AMOS نشان داد که بعد محیطی (64/0= β) بیشترین تأثیر را بر بهبود کیفیت محیط‌های شهری دارد پس از آن، ابعاد کالبدی (56/0=β)، دسترس‌پذیری (54/0=β)، سلامت (46/0=β)، اجتماعی - فرهنگی (39/0= β) ایمنی - امنیت (37/0=β)، قرار دارند. این پژوهش بر اهمیت عوامل محیطی و کالبدی در شکل‌گیری فضاهای شهری مناسب برای زنان تأکید دارد؛ بنابراین، برنامه‌ریزان شهری باید این مؤلفه‌ها را در اولویت قرار دهند تا زمینه مشارکت بیشتر زنان در فضاهای شهری فراهم شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Analyzing the Components of a Women-Friendly City: A case study of Ardabil

نویسندگان English

Parya Nasiri
Alireza Mohammadi
Mansour rahmati
Atta Ghafari Gilande
Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
چکیده English

A B S T R A C T
Women in developing countries, including Iran, face various challenges in accessing and utilizing urban spaces. These challenges stem from limited access to safe environments, inadequate facilities, and socio-cultural constraints, which hinder their presence and participation in urban life. This study evaluates the status of Ardabil as a "Women-Friendly City" based on key indicators. Employing a descriptive-analytical and survey-based approach, data were collected through a researcher-designed questionnaire. The statistical sample consisted of 384 women from Ardabil, selected using Cochran’s formula and simple random sampling. Data analysis was conducted using a one-sample t-test in SPSS, along with structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in AMOS. The findings revealed that the six indicators associated with a Women-Friendly City in Ardabil were below the average reference level (3) and generally unsatisfactory. Furthermore, the path analysis results in AMOS indicated that the environmental dimension (β = 0.64) had the most significant impact on improving urban quality, followed by the physical (β = 0.56), accessibility (β = 0.54), health (β = 0.46), socio-cultural (β = 0.39), and safety-security (β = 0.37) dimensions. These results emphasize the critical role of environmental and physical factors in shaping inclusive urban spaces for women. Hence, urban planners should prioritize these elements to foster greater female participation in urban settings.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Urban environments significantly shape individuals' daily experiences, particularly for women, whose mobility, safety, and participation in public spaces are often hindered by socio-cultural and physical constraints. The concept of a "Women-Friendly City" has emerged as a framework for assessing urban areas based on inclusivity, accessibility, and overall quality of life for women. This perspective highlights the importance of gender-sensitive urban planning that ensures equitable opportunities for women to engage in social, economic, and cultural activities within the city.
In many developing countries, including Iran, women face numerous obstacles when navigating urban spaces. These challenges include inadequate infrastructure, limited safety measures, and deep-rooted cultural norms that restrict women's presence in public areas. Consequently, their access to essential services, economic opportunities, and overall sense of belonging in the city is compromised. Addressing these issues requires a systematic evaluation of factors that contribute to a women-friendly city, providing urban planners and policymakers with insights to implement targeted improvements that enhance women’s urban experiences.
This study examines Ardabil in Iran to evaluate its status as a women-friendly city based on six critical indicators: environmental, safety and security, socio-cultural, accessibility, health, and physical-visual aspects. By assessing these dimensions, the research aims to highlight existing shortcomings and propose solutions for improving urban conditions for women. Accordingly, this study seeks to answer the following research questions:

To what extent does Ardabil meet the criteria of a "Women-Friendly City"?
Which components and indicators of a Women-Friendly City are most influential in Ardabil?

 
Methodology
This study employed a descriptive-analytical approach, combining library research and field research. The library research phase involved reviewing existing studies to develop the theoretical framework, while the field research phase collected primary data through a structured questionnaire.The study population comprised 292,997 female residents of Ardabil, with a sample size of 384, determined using Cochran’s formula at a 5% error margin. A systematic random sampling method was used to ensure a representative selection of participants.
The questionnaire, structured on a 5-point Likert scale, consisted of 58 items measuring 6 core dimensions such as environmental, safety and security, socio-cultural, accessibility, health, and physical-visual aspects. The questionnaire’s reliability was confirmed with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.988.
For data analysis, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in AMOS was used to examine variable relationships, while T-tests in SPSS assessed component scores relative to the reference value (3). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was conducted to evaluate data normality.
 
Results and discussion
This study evaluated Ardabil’s status as a women-friendly city based on six key indicators. The findings show that 59% of participants were married, with the majority aged 31–40 years. In terms of education, 29% held a bachelor's degree, while only 7% had a doctoral degree.
The T-test results indicate that all six indicators scored below the reference value (3), suggesting an unsatisfactory urban environment for women. The environmental factor had a mean score of 2.83, while safety and security (2.92), socio-cultural (2.78), accessibility (2.85), health (2.85), and physical-visual (2.98) also reflected unfavorable conditions. These findings highlight the need for urban policy improvements to enhance women's experiences in Ardabil.
Moreover, path analysis in AMOS identified the environmental factor (β = 0.64) as having the strongest influence on urban quality, followed by physical-visual (β = 0.56), accessibility (β = 0.54), health (β = 0.46), socio-cultural (β = 0.39), and safety-security (β = 0.37). These results suggest that enhancing environmental and physical infrastructure should be a priority in urban planning to create a more inclusive city for women.
 
Conclusion
This study examined the status of Ardabil as a women-friendly city, focusing on the influence of key urban indicators on enhancing women's quality of life. The T-test results indicated that all six indicators such as environmental, safety and security, socio-cultural, accessibility, health, and physical-visual, fell below the reference value, reflecting an unfavorable urban condition for women. Additionally, path analysis demonstrated that the environmental factor (β = 0.64) had the strongest impact on urban quality, whereas the safety and security factor (β = 0.37) had the least influence. These findings underscore the necessity of strategic urban planning and policy reforms to create a more inclusive and supportive urban environment for women. Enhancing environmental and physical infrastructure should be a priority in making Ardabil a safer, more accessible, and gender-responsive city.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Empowerment of Women
Gender Inequality
Quality of Life
Public Space
Social Security
  1. اعلمی، رومینا؛ توکلی‌نیا، جمیله و محمدیان مصمم، حسن. (1402). تحلیل تطبیقی شهرهای ایران با تأکید بر شهر دوستدار کودک مطالعه موردی: کلان‌شهرهای تهران و اصفهان. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا.13(4)، 118-103. Doi: 10. 0488/gps.2024.430897.3704
  2. خوارزمی، امیدعلی؛ جوهری، لیلا و خوارزمی، امیرعلی. (1399). ارزیابی شهر شاخص‌های دوستدار در کلان‌شهر مشهد. دو فصلنامه جغرافیای اجتماعی شهر، 1 (7)، 210-191. Doi:10.22103/JUSG.2020.2011
  3. رشیدکلویر، حجت‌الله؛ کریمی آذری، امیررضا و پوررضا، سید هادی. (1399). ارزیابی ایجاد مؤلفه‌های شهر دوستدار کودک در شهر بندرانزلی.  فصلنامه دانش شهرسازی. 4 (3)، 51-65. Doi:10. 2124/upk.2020.14181.127
  4. روستا، مریم، و احمدی، پردیس. (1398). بررسی تأثیر عوامل سید هادی محیطی بر احساس امنیت زنان (نمونه موردی محله سهل‌آباد شیراز). پژوهش‌های راهبردی مسائل اجتماعی ایران، (1)8، 96-85. Doi: 10.22108/ssoss.2019.111934.1
  5. طهری، فضیلت؛ نسترن، مهین، و اجلالی، حسین پرویز. (1400). ارزیابی کیفیت محیط شهر رشت از دیدگاه برنامه‌ریزی شهری تنوع‌گرا (با تأکید بر چهار گروه اجتماعی زنان، توان‌خواهان، سالمندان و کودکان). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری. 9(3)، 801-833. Doi: 10. 2059/jurbangeo.2021.318494.1456
  6. عبداللهی، علی‌اصغر و آذرنوش، فروغ. (1401). ارزیابی فضاهای شهری برای کودکان بر اساس اصول شهر دوستدار کودک (مطالعه موردی: شهر کرمان). دو فصلنامه جغرافیای اجتماعی شهری. 9 (1)، 96-77. Doi: 10. 2103/JUSG.2022.2062
  7. غلامی، یونس؛ ثقفی، مهدی، و حیدری، مریم. (1397). تأثیر عوامل اجتماعی اقتصادی در مشارکت شهروندان با تأکید بر مدیریت پسماند خانگی (نمونه موردی شهر گرگان). مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا. 8(30)158-149. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2019.85841
  8. فاضلی، نعمت‌الله و ضیاچی، محدثه. (1393). شهر دوستدار زن معیارهای شهر دوستدار زن از نظر زنان متعلق به و تیپ‌های مختلف اجتماعی تهران. جامعه پژوهی فرهنگی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی. 5 (3)، 59–93.
  9. گرمسیری نژاد، سروش؛ خرم بخت، احمدعلی و موغلی، مرضیه. (1400). ارزیابی کیفیت فضاهای عمومی شهری بر مبنای دیدگاه جنسیتی (مطالعه موردی: شهر جدید عالی شهر).  فصلنامه مطالعات جامعه‌شناسی،  14(53)، 143-129. https://doi. rg/10.30495/jss.2021.1935157.1359
  10. مبری، حسین؛ ستارزاده، داریوش؛ ثقفی اصل، آرش و حق لسان، مسعود. (1402). تحلیلی بر وضعیت محلات شهر از منظر مؤلفه‌های تاب‌آوری شهری مطالعه موردی: محلات شهر تنکابن. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا. 13(4)21-39. doi: 10.30488/gps.2023.360912.3576
  11. مرادی نژاد، زینب؛ کرمی، محمدتقی، امینی، سعیده و ذکایی، سعید. (1401). استراتژی‌های زنان ایرانی جهت ورود به عرصه سیاست و مواجهه با امر سیاسی.  فصلنامه زن در توسعه و سیاست، 20 (2)، 287-314. https://doi.org/10.22059/jwdp.2022.335983.1008131

 

  1. Abbaszadeh, M. (2023). Evaluation of the effective components of the presence of women in urban spaces: the case study a historical bazaar of Urmia. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)10(4), 23-40.‌ Doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.342453.1695 [In Persian].
  2. Abdolahi, A. A. & Azarnoosh, F. (2022). Evaluation of urban spaces for children based on the principles of a child-friendly city (Case study: Kerman). Journal of Urban Social Geography9(1), 77-96. Doi: 10.22103/JUSG.2022.2062 [In Persian].
  3. Androulakia, M., Frangedakib, E., & Antoniadis, P. (2020). Optimization of Public Spaces Through Network Potentials of Communities. 1st International Conference on Optimization-Driven Architectural Design(OPTARCH 2019). Procedia Manufacturing, 44, 294–301.
  4. Alami, R., tavakolinia, J., & mohammadian mosammam, H. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Iranian Cities with Emphasis on Child-Friendly City The case of Tehran and Isfahan metropolises. Geographical Planning of Space13(4), 103-118. doi: 10.30488/gps.2024.430897.3704 [In Persian].
  5. Bertrand, J., & Perrin, C. (2022). Girls Just Wanna Have Funds? The effect of women-friendly legislation on female-led firms’ access to credit. International Review of Law and Economics, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2022.106101.
  6. Center for Women's Participation. (2020). Social and Cultural Survey of Iranian Women.
  7. Chakraborty, M. (2019). Gender and Urban Planning: Understanding the Impacts of Urban Development on Women. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(5), 690-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1620730.
  8. Efe Güney, M., Beste, T., Sıdal, T., Nurseli, Ş., Hacer, A., & Filiz, A. (2022). “The Assessment of the Criteria of Social Infrastructure within the Scope of Women-Friendly City Planning Approach: The Example of Çiğli.” Iconarp International J. of Architecture and Planning. 10 (2): 800–843. https://doi.org/10.15320/iconarp.2022.225.
  9. Fazeli, N. & Ziachi, M. (2014). Exploration of Woman-Friendly City Indicators in the Views of Women from Different Social Statuses and Types in Tehran. Sociological Cultural Studies5(3), 55-85. [In Persian].
  10. Garmsiri Nejad, S., Khorram Bakht, A. A., & Mowgli, M. (2017). Evaluating the quality of urban public spaces based on a gender perspective (case study: Aali Shahr New City). journal of sociology studies, 14(53), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.30495/jss.2021.1935157.1359 [In Persian].
  11. Gholami, Y., Saghafi, M., & Heidari, M. (2019). The effect socio-economic indicators of citizen participation in the management of household waste (case study of gorgan). Geographical Planning of Space, 8(30), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2019.85841 [In Persian].
  12. Haltia-Nurmi, M. (2024). Towards More Equal and Family Friendly Working Life—Tackling Pregnancy and Family Leave Discrimination Through Social Design.‌ https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/864651/Haltia-Nurmi.pdf?sequence=5
  13. Hwang, W. (2019). The Effects of Family-Friendly Policies and Workplace Social Support on Parenting Stress in Employed Mothers Working Nonstandard Hours. Journal of Social Service Research, 45(5), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2018.1501790.
  14. Jianga, B., Makb, C., Larsenc, L., & Zhongd, H. (2017). Minimizing the gender difference in perceived safety:Comparing the effects of urban back alley interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.012
  15. Kharazmi, O. A., Johari, L. & Kharazmi, A. A. (2020). Assessing the child friendly city indicators in Mashhad metropolis. Journal of Urban Social Geography7(1), 191-210. doi: 10.22103/JUSG.2020.2011[In Persian].
  16. Li, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., & Tian, X. (2019). The impact of social and cultural spaces on urban women’s quality of life: A comparative study in Chinese cities. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 145(3), 04019020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000515
  17. Linda, P., & Priska, L. (2024). Role and Position of the Minister of Women ’ s Empowerment and Child Protection ’ s Regulation on Gender-Responsive and Child- Friendly Work Facilities (Issue Icpsd). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-315-3
  18. Liu, Z. (2022, April). Research on Women-friendly City Construction under She-economics Background. In 2022 International Conference on Creative Industry and Knowledge Economy (CIKE 2022) (pp. 164-167). Atlantis Press.‌ https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220404.031
  19. Lugosi, P., Golubovskaya, M., Robinson, R. N. S., Quinton, S., & Konz, J. (2020). Creating Family-friendly Pub Experiences: A Composite Data Study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102690
  20. Mobarra, H., Sattarzadeh, D., saghafi asl, A. & haghlesan, M. (2024). An Analysis of the State of City Neighborhoods from the Perspective of Urban Resilience Components the Case Study of Tonekabon Neighborhoods. Geographical Planning of Space13(4), 21-39. doi: 10.30488/gps.2023.360912.3576 [In Persian].
  21. Memela, S., & Maharaj, B. (2018). Refugees, violence and gender: The case of women in the Albert Park area in Durban, South Africa. In Urban Forum (Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 429-443). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.‌ https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-018-9356-1
  22. Molina-Torres, R., Nolasco-Jáuregui, O., Rodriguez-Torres, E. E., Itzá-Ortiz, B. A., & Quezada-Téllez, (2021). A comparative analysis of urban development, economi level, and COVID-19 cases in Mexico City. Journal of Urban Management, 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2021.06.007
  23. moradinezhad, Z., karami, M. T., Amini, S. & zokaei, S. (2022). Strategies of Iranian Women to Enter the Field of Politics and Face Political issues. Woman in Development & Politics20(2), 314-287. https://doi.org/10.22059/jwdp.2022.335983.1008131 [In Persian].
  24. Movshovich, J. (2014). Children's participation in society; a key to development: children as essential actors in improving their lives and communities (Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne).‌ https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01140059v1
  25. Rashid Kolvir, H., Karimi azeri, A. R. & Purreza, S. H. (2020). Assessment of Creating Child Friendly City Components in Bandar-e Anzali. Urban Planning Knowledge4(3), 51-65. doi: 10.22124/upk.2020.14181.1273[In Persian].
  26. Roosta, M. & Ahmadi, P. (2019). Evaluating the Impact of Environmental Factors on Women's Sense of Safety (Case study: Sahlabad Neighborhood- Shiraz). Strategic Research on Social Problems8(1), 85-96. doi: 10.22108/ssoss.2019.111934.1266 [In Persian].
  27. Rebernik, N., Szajczyk, M., Bahillo, A., & Goličnik Marušić, B. (2020). Measuring disability inclusion performance in cities using Disability Inclusion Evaluation Tool (DIETool). Sustainability, 12(4), 1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041378
  28. Tahari, F., Nastaran, M. & Ejlali, H. P. (2021). Assessing the quality of Rasht's environment from the diversity-oriented urban planning perspective (with emphasis on the four social groups of women, the disabled, the elderly and children). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)9(3), 801-833. Doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.318494.1456 [In Persian].
  29. UN Women. (2024). "Gender Equality and Women Empowerment Progress Report 2024." Retrieved from https://www.unwomen.org, p. 14, p. 22. https://www.unwomen.org.
  30. United Nations. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals – Decade of Action. Retrieved February 22, 2022, from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/decade-of-action/
  31. Windiyani, W., Hamid, R. S., Syamsuddin, S., & Ikbal, M. (2024). The Role of Women Entrepreneurship and Eco-Friendly Entrepreneurship on Market Orientation and Marketing Performance of Female Entrepreneurs. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 15(Iconomics 2023), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v15i.943
  32. Yadav, A., & Rashmi, K. (2021). “Women and Social Sustainability: A Critical Parametric Evaluation of Urban Settings in Developing Countries.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 795 (1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/795/1/012003
  33. Yamamoto, H., & Okura, S. (2023). Female Assembly Members and the Adoption of Women-Friendly Policies in Japanese Local Municipalities. Asian Survey, 63(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2023.1820098