مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا

مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا

تحلیل تأثیر توسعه منطقه‌ای بر بهبود مدیریت یکپارچه شهری با رویکرد پایداری، مطالعه موردی: ‌شهر تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
زهرا عبدالهی 1
عباس افرادی 2
رضا قنواتی 3
امین پورقاسمی صوفیانی 4
1 گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر تهران، تهران، ایران
2 گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، واحد اصفهان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
3 گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور رضوان‌شهر، یزد، ایران
4 گروه برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت شهری، دانشکده شهرسازی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
10.30488/gps.2026.519494.3843
چکیده
توسعه منطقه‌ای به‌عنوان یکی از رویکردهای کلان برنامه‌ریزی فضایی می‌تواند نقش مؤثری در بهبود مدیریت یکپارچه شهری ایفا کرده و زمینه‌ساز تحقق توسعه متوازن و پایدار در کلان‌شهرها باشد. این نگرش به مدیریت، به‌دنبال ادغام منابع، بهره‌وری بالاتر، و توزیع عادلانه‌تر منافع از توسعه است. ازاین‌رو، هدف پژوهش حاضر تحلیل نقش توسعه پایدار با تمرکز بر توسعه منطقه‌ای به‌عنوان زیربنای تقویت مدیریت یکپارچه شهری در کلان‌شهر تهران است. Top of Formروش تحقیق پژوهش حاضر توصیفی- پیمایشی و از نوع کاربردی و همبستگی است. جهت گردآوری مبانی نظری اطلاعات در خصوص تبیین ادبیات موضوع تحقیق از روش کتابخانه‌ای و مطالعات اسنادی استفاده گردید. ابزار گردآوری داده‎ها در تحقیق حاضر پرسش‌نامه بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش، ساکنین مناطق مختلف شهر تهران بود. همچنین از فرمول کوکران برای محاسبه نمونه آماری پژوهش استفاده شد. حجم نمونه 384 نفر تعیین شد که به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده تکمیل گردید. در نهایت برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌های پژوهش از نرم‌افزارهای Spss و Smart-Pls استفاده شد. یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که افزایش در توسعه پایدار و ابعاد آن با ارتقاء معناداری در مدیریت یکپارچه شهری و بهبود محسوس در عملکرد و کارایی نهادهای مرتبط همراه خواهد بود. همچنین، تمرکز بر توسعه منطقه‌ای و تقویت ابعاد آن، ظرفیت مدیریت یکپارچه را افزایش داده و موجب رشد و توانمندسازی سازمان‌های شهری می‌شود. در مجموع، نتایج پژوهش بر وجود همبستگی مثبت و معنی‌دار میان توسعه پایدار و مدیریت یکپارچه تأکید دارد. این همبستگی می‌تواند به بهبود چشمگیری در عملکرد و اداره‌ سازمان‌ها در شهر تهران منجر شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
توسعه پایدار
مدیریت یکپارچه شهری
توسعه منطقه‌ای
پایداری
تهران

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Analyzing the impact of regional development on improving integrated urban management with a sustainability approach: A case study of Tehran City

نویسندگان English

Zahra Abdolahi 1
Abbas Afradi 2
Reza Qanavati 3
Amin Pourghasemi sofiani 4
1 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tehran University of Arts, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Social Sciences, Payam Noor Razvanshahr University, Yazd, Iran
4 Department of Urban Planning and Management, Faculty of Urban Planning, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

A B S T R A C T
Regional development, as one of the overarching approaches in spatial planning, can play a significant role in enhancing integrated urban management and pave the way for achieving balanced and sustainable development in metropolitan areas. This approach to management seeks the integration of resources, higher productivity, and a fairer distribution of the benefits of development. The purpose of the present study is to analyze the role of sustainable development with a focus on regional development as the basis for strengthening integrated urban management in the metropolis of Tehran. The research method of the present study is descriptive-survey and is of applied and correlational type. In order to collect the theoretical foundations of information regarding the explanation of the research literature, the library method and documentary studies were used. The data collection tool in the present study was a questionnaire. The statistical population of the study was the residents of different areas of Tehran. Also, Cochran's formula was used to calculate the statistical sample of the study. The sample size was determined to be 384 people, who were selected by simple random sampling. Finally, Spss and Smart-Pls software were used to analyze the research data. The results reveal that higher levels of sustainable development and its components are significantly associated with enhanced integrated urban management and notable improvements in the efficiency and effectiveness of urban organizations. Moreover, prioritizing regional development and strengthening its dimensions increases the capacity for integrated management and contributes to the growth and empowerment of urban institutions. Overall, the study underscores a positive and significant correlation between sustainable development and integrated management, a relationship that can lead to substantial improvements in the governance and performance of metropolitan Tehran.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Integrated management, as a fundamental pillar of regional development, plays a crucial role in achieving the goals of sustainable development and land use planning. By emphasizing coordination and cooperation among various groups and institutions, integrated management can pave the way for balanced and sustainable development in different regions. This approach to management seeks the integration of resources, higher productivity, and a fairer distribution of the benefits of development. Therefore, the realization of effective and sustainable regional development requires the use of integrated management approaches and strategies that are implemented for the purpose of sustainable development and improving the quality of life in these regions. Given the current challenges related to climate change, energy poverty, reduced biodiversity, and other environmental problems, the need for sustainable development that is managed in a more comprehensive and integrated manner at regional scales has increased. With this introduction, the purpose of the present study is to analyze the role of sustainable development with a focus on regional development as the basis for strengthening integrated urban management in the metropolis of Tehran. Specifically, this research examines the impact of sustainable development on integrated management with a focus on regional development criteria in the city of Tehran. The challenges and obstacles that exist in the path of achieving the goals of sustainable development and integrated management lead this research towards a better understanding of their causes and prerequisites for success.
 
Methodology
The research method of the present study is descriptive-survey and is of applied and correlational type. Various documentary, library, and field methods were used to collect information; in a way that in the documentary and library method, the theoretical foundations related to the research topic - reference books, articles related to the research topic, etc. - were reviewed, and in the field method, a questionnaire in the form of a Likert scale was used to collect the required data. The statistical population of the study is the residents of different areas of Tehran. Accordingly, and given its large population, the sample size of the study was considered to be 384 people using Cochran's formula, and the questionnaires were distributed randomly among the citizens. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by face validity and with regard to the opinions of geography and urban planning experts as well as university professors. Also, the research instrument had good reliability and high internal consistency. So that the Cronbach's alpha value of all indicators as well as the composite reliability of all variables was greater than 0.7, and their convergent validity was also higher than 0.5. Spss and Smart-Pls software were used to analyze the information in the present study.
 
Results and discussion
The present study was based on two hypotheses: In the first hypothesis, it was assumed that the dimensions of sustainable development (economic, social, environmental, and infrastructure and transportation) have an impact on strengthening the integrated management of Tehran; By examining the statistical results, it was found that the impact of sustainable development and its dimensions on strengthening the integrated management of Tehran is statistically significant. So that the t-value for the total dimensions was 5.261.Also, the significance level lower than 0.05 showed that this relationship is significant at the 99% confidence level. Based on this, it can be concluded that the dimensions of sustainable development significantly affect the strengthening of integrated management in the city of Tehran. So that with any increase in the sustainable development variable and each of its dimensions, the integrated management variable will also be accompanied by a significant increase. In the second hypothesis, it was also assumed that the focus on regional development as one of the essential components of sustainable development has a positive and significant impact on promoting integrated urban management in Tehran. The results of the analysis showed that sustainable development with a focus on regional development can strengthen integrated urban management in the city of Tehran. The path coefficient (beta) corresponding to this relationship was positive and significant, and the T-value of 2.066 with a significance level of 0.039 showed that this relationship is statistically significant. These results show that sustainable development, along with regional development, can facilitate and strengthen the improvement of integrated management, which can lead to the growth and progress of organizations in this city.
 
Conclusion
The overall results of the research show that sustainable development has a positive and significant effect on integrated regional management in the city of Tehran. In a way that an increase in sustainable development will be accompanied by a significant increase in the integrated management of regional development and a significant improvement in the performance and efficiency of organizations.Also, focusing on regional development and land use planning increases the ability to strengthen integrated management and leads to the growth and progress of urban organizations. Therefore, having a macro-territorial view in planning with regard to existing capacities, capacity building through increasing competition within and between regions, and in general, the importance of attention to land use planning as a fundamental and decisive concept in the planning process, along with the management of resources and the preservation of existing and future potentials of Tehran, can provide the basis for achieving a balanced territorial development commensurate with all capacities.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
 
Authors’Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sustainable Development
Integrated Urban Management
Regional Development
Sustainability
Tehran
  1. امیدعلی، اسماعیل؛ فنی، زهره و شفیعی ثابت، ناصر. (1401). اولویت‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه منطقه‌ای در ایران. فصلنامه علمی برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 14(54)، 36-23. https://doi.org/10.30495/jzpm.2022.30594.4118
  2. بزاززاده، مهدی؛ داداش پور، هاشم و مطوف، شریف. (1393). بررسی و تحلیل عوامل کلیدی مؤثر بر توسعه منطقه‌ای با رویکرد آینده‌نگاری منطقه‌ای، مطالعه موردی: استان آذربایجان غربی، ایران. برنامه‌ریزی فضایی. 4(2). 79-104. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22287485.1393.4.2.5.1
  3. داوری، علی و رضازاده، آرش. (1392). مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری با نرم افزارSmart Pls . انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی. تهران.
  4. درویشی، هدایت‌اله و سجودی، مریم. (1402). برررسی پیامدهای مکانی- فضایی اجرای الگوی یکپارچه درون‌زای توسعه منطقه‌ای (موردپژوهی: طرح توسعه منطقه‌ای سلسله (الشتر). آمایش سرزمین، 15(1)، 51-33. https://doi.org/10.22059/ jtcp.2022.345571.670334
  5. دیوسالار، اسدالله؛ علی اکبری، اسماعیل و بخشی، امیر. (1397). بررسی نقش رشد هوشمند در توسعه پایدار شهرهای ساحلی (موردمطالعه: شهر بابلسر). آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 8(29)، 200-181.
  6. زبردست، علیرضا و درسخوان، رسول. (1400). تبیین مؤلفه‌های دستیابی به توسعه پایدار محیطی در ساختار مدیریت شهری کلان‌شهر تبریز. پایداری، توسعه و محیط زیست، 2(3). 21-40.
  7. زیاری، کرامت اله؛ حاتمی، احمد و صفرپور، ابوالحسن. (1400). ارزیابی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های زیست‌پذیری در نواحی شهری با رویکرد توسعه پایدار (نمونه موردی نواحی شهر خرم‌آباد). چشم‌انداز شهرهای آینده، 2(2). 33-50.
  8.  سجودی، مریم؛ زیاری، کرامت اله؛ پوراحمد، احمد و یاسوری، مجید. (1400). واکاوی نقش و جایگاه آسیب‌شناسی و ارائه الگوی توسعه­ منطقه‌ای در مطالعات داخلی و خارجی. چشم‌انداز مطالعات شهری و روستایی، 1(4)، 17-37.
  9. سجودی، مریم؛ زیاری، کرامت اله؛پوراحمد، احمد و یاسوری، مجید. (1401). مقایسه­ی تطبیقی گزاره‌های الگوی فعلی و الگوی مطلوب توسعه منطقه‌ای (مطالعه­ی موردی: استان گیلان). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای اقتصادی، 3(7)، 94-106.
  10. سنجولی، بدیل؛ کریمیان بستانی، مریم و حافظ رضازاده، معصومه. (1401). تحلیل آمایشی رویکردهای برنامه‌ریزی و طراحی شهر جدید تیس در راستای توسعه منطقه‌ای سواحل مکران. تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، 22(64)، 398-379.
  11. شامی، محمدرضا؛ بیگدلی‌راد، وحید و معینی‌فر، مریم. (1401). ارزیابی و سنجش شاخص‌های کیفیت زندگی هوشمند شهری در شهر تهران. مجله شهر پایدار، 5(4)، 192-177. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.24766631.1401.5.4.10.5
  12. ضرابی، اصغر و تبریزی، نازنین. (1390). تعیین سطح توسعه یافتگی شهرستان‌های استان مازندران- رویکرد تحلیل عاملی. فصلنامه جغرافیایی آمایش محیط، 12، 78-63.
  13. کاوه، امیر؛ کریمیان بستانی، مریم و میری، غلامرضا. (1403). نقش مدیریت یکپارچه در تحقق حمل‌ونقل هوشمند شهری (مطالعه موردی: زاهدان). تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، 24(73)، 46-26. https://doi.org/10.61186/jgs.24.73.26
  14. کمانرودی کجوری، موسی؛ سعیدی، امید و رضوی، سیده معصومه. (1403). سنجش تأثیر مدیریت یکپارچه شهری بر توسعه حمل‌ونقل و ترافیک در کلان‌شهر اهواز. مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری، 11(39)، 155-133. https://doi.org/10.22080/usfs.2024.26393.2403
  15. کورکی‌نژاد، محمدحسن؛ شمسی‌پور، علی‌اکبر و حبیبی، کیومرث. (1403). دستورالعمل‌های برنامه‌ریزی با نقشه‌های اقلیم شهری (مطالعه موردی: شهر تهران). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 11(3)، 20-1. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.351363.1759
  16. لطفی‌بزازان، سروش؛ صارمی، حمیدرضا و بغدادی، آرش. (1402). شناسایی عوامل پیشران در آینده‌پژوهی نظام برنامه‌ریزی مسکن ایران (مطالعه موردی: شهر تهران). مجله شهر پایدار، 6(4)، 121-105. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2023.403067.1713
  17. مسعودی، محمدباقر؛ معمری، ابراهیم و معمری، فرهاد. (1398). بررسی پراکنش فضایی شاخص‌های توسعه پایدار شهری- روستایی با تأکید بر شاخص‌های آموزشی در پهنۀ استان گلستان. آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 9(34)، 260-245. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2019.71485.2339
  18. محمدپناهی، صدیقه؛ وارثی، حمیدرضا و تقوایی، مسعود. (1402). برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک توسعه منطقه ایلام بر مبنای رقابت‌پذیری منطقه‌ای. جغرافیا و توسعه ناحیه‌ای، 21(1)، 231-209. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2023.79363.1205
  19. محمدی، علیرضا و محبوبی، حسن. (1401). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی پارامترهای مؤثر بر استقرار طرح مدیریت یکپارچه مناطق ساحلی با رویکرد توسعه پایدار در سواحل مکران. چهارمین همایش ملی توسعه سواحل مکران (با محوریت حکمرانی و تأکید بر دیپلماسی و اقتصاد دریا محور).
  20. معتمدی، محمد و فرزانه، مرضیه. (1401). نقش مدیریت یکپارچه شهری در توسعه پایدار فضاهای سبز شهری. هشتمین کنگره سالانه بین‌المللی عمران، معماری و توسعه شهری. تهران.
  21. نجفی، فریما؛ پریزادی، طاهر و فصیحی، حبیب‌اله. (1403). تحلیل پیوند فضایی عوامل محیطی و پایگاه اجتماعی ساکنان در شهر تهران از دیدگاه عدالت محیط‌زیستی. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 12(2)، 178-161. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.379275.1964
  22. Abubakar, I. R. (2017). Access to sanitation facilities among nigerian households: Determinants and sustainability implications. College of Architecture and Planning, University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 9(4), 547. DOI:10.3390/su9040547
  23. Apostolache, M. A. )2014(. Regional Development in Romania–From Regulations toPractice. Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00059-8
  24. Ardito, L., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Albino, V. (2015). From technological inventions to new products: a systematic review and research agenda of the main enabling factors. European Management Review, 12, 113-147. DOI:10.1111/emre.12047
  25. Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A., & Ahmad, N. (2011).An integrated management systems approach to corporate sustainability. European Business Review, 23(4), 353-367. DOI:10.1108/09555341111145744
  26. Basiago, A. D. (1998). Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. Environmentalist, 19(2), 145-161.‏ DOI: 10.4236/cus.2019.74025
  27. BazazZadeh, M., Dadashpoor, H., & Motavaf, S. (2014). Analysis the Key Factors Impacting on Regional Development using Regional Foresight approach, The Case Study of West Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Spatial Planning, 4(2), 79-104.‏ https://doi.org/20.1001.1.22287485.1393.4.2.5.1 [In Persian].
  28. Benaim, A., Collins, A., & Raftis, L. (2008). Social dimension of sustainable development: guidance and application.‏ DOI:10.36369/2616-9045/2024/v13i2a6
  29. Ben-Eli, M. (2015).‏ "Sustainability: definition and five core principles." A Sustainability. Laboratory Publication, New York. DOI:10.1007/s11625-018-0564-3
  30. Bodenheimer, S. (1971). Dependency and imperialism: the roots of Latin American underdevelopment. Politics & Society, 1(3), 327-357.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/003232927100100303
  31. Browning, M. H., & Rigolon, A. (2019). School green space and its impact on academic performance: A systematic literature review. International Journal of environmental research and public health, 16(3), 429.‏ DOI:10.3390/ijerph16030429
  32. Cerin, P. (2006). Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: A discussion on the Coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 56(2), 209-225.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.016
  33. Darvishi, H., & Sojoodi, M. (2023). The Examination of the Locative-Spatial Consequences of the Implementation of Integrated Model of Endogenous Regional Development (Case Study: Regional Development Plan of Selseleh Aleshtar). Town and Country Planning, 15(1), 33-51.‏ https://doi.org/10.22059/ jtcp.2022.345571.670334 [In Persian]
  34. Davari, A., & Rezazadeh, A. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling with Smart Pls Software. Tehran: Jihad Daneshgahi Publications. [In Persian]
  35. Dernbach, J. C. (2003). Achieving sustainable development: The centrality and multiple facets of integrated decisionmaking. Global Legal Studies, 10(1), 247-284. DOI:10.2979/GLS.2003.10.1.247
  36. Divsalar, A., Aliakbari, E., & Bakhshi, A. (2018). The role of smart growth in sustainable development of coastal cities (case study: Babolsar). Geographical Planning of Space, 8(29), 181-200.‏‏ [In Persian]
  37. Dong, X., Zhang, X., Jing, Y., Zhou, Q., Bai, L., & Du, S. (2024). Does every public open space (POS) contribute to sustainable city development? An assessment of inefficient POS in Beijing. Sustainable Cities and Society, 105980. DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105980
  38. Du Pisani, J. A. (2006). Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept. Environmental Sciences, 3(2), 83–96. DOI:10.1080/15693430600688831
  39. Fedorov, L. )2002(.Regional inequality and regional polarization in Russia, 1990–99. World Development, 30(3), 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00124-3
  40. Fernandes, R. S., Rocha, T. R., Coelho, J. M., & Andrade, D. F. (2023). Development of a measurement instrument to evaluate integrated management systems and differences in perception: an approach to item response theory and the quality management process. Production, 33, e20220069. DOI:10.1590/0103-6513.20220069
  41. Florêncio, M., Oliveira, L., & Oliveira, H. C. (2023). Management control systems and the integration of the sustainable development goals into business models. Sustainability, 15(3), 2246. DOI:10.3390/su16125067
  42. Garcia, C., López-Jiménez, P. A., Pérez-Sánchez, M., & Sanchis, R. (2024). Methodology for assessing progress in sustainable development goals indicators in urban water systems. How far are we from the 2030 targets?. Sustainable Cities and Society, 112, 105616.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105616
  43. Garcia, C., López-Jiménez, P. A., Sánchez-Romero, F. J., & Pérez-Sánchez, M. (2023). Assessing water urban systems to the compliance of SDGs through sustainability indicators. Implementation in the valencian community. Sustainable Cities and Society, 96, 104704.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104704
  44. Gossling-Goidsmiths, J. (2018). Sustainable development goals and uncertainty visualization. Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Twente.‏ DOI: 10.4236/ojps.2019.94041
  45. Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological indicators, 60, 565-573.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
  46. Kamanroudi Kojouri, M., Saeidi, O., & Razavii, M. (2024). Measuring the effect of integrated urban management on the development of transportation and traffic in Ahvaz metropolis. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 11(39), 133-155.‏ https://doi.org/10.22080/usfs.2024.26393.2403 [In Persian]
  47. Kaveh, A., & Karimian Bostani, M. (2024). The role of integrated management in the realization of intelligent transportation (Case study: Zahedan city). Applied researches in Geographical Sciences, 24(73), 26-46.‏ https://doi.org/10.61186/jgs.24.73.26 [In Persian]
  48. KorkiNezhad, M., Shamsipour, A., & Habibi, K. (2023). lanning recommendations with urban climate maps The Case study of Tehran city. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 11(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2023.351363.1759 (In Persian)‏
  49. Lele, S. M. (1991, June). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6), 607–662. DOI:10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
  50. Liu, Y., Dong, K., Wang, K., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2024). Moving towards sustainable city: Can China's green finance policy lead to sustainable development of cities?. Sustainable Cities and Society, 102, 105242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105242
  51. Lotfi Bazazan, S., Sarmi, H. R., & Baghdadi, A. (2023). Identifying Driving Factors in the Future Research of Iran's Housing Planning System the Case Study of Tehran. Journal of Sustainable city, 6(4), 105-121.‏ https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2023.403067.1713 [In Persian]
  52. Lu, H., Lu, X., Jiao, L., & Zhang, Y. (2022).Evaluating urban agglomeration resilience to disaster in the Yangtze Delta city group in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103464. DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
  53. Masodi, M. B., & Moammare, E. (2020). Study of spatial dispersion of indicators of sustainable urban-rural development with emphasis on educational indices in Golestan province. Geographical Planning of Space, 9(34), 245-260.‏https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2019.71485.2339[In Persian]
  54. Masuin, R., Latief, Y., Zagloel, T. Y., & Sagita, L. (2018, June). Integrated management system to achieve sustainable construction-A conceptual framework. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1977, No. 1). AIP Publishing.‏ DOI:10.1063/1.5042983
  55. Mohammadi, A., & Mahboubi, H. (2021). Identifying and ranking the parameters affecting the establishment of an integrated coastal zone management plan with a sustainable development approach on the Makran coast. The Fourth National Conference on the Development of the Makran Coast (with a focus on governance and an emphasis on diplomacy and a maritime economy). [In Persian]
  56. Mohammadpanahi, S., Taghvaei, M., & Varesi, H. (2023). Strategic Planning for Regional Development of Ilam based on Regional Competitiveness.‏ Geogeraphy and Regional Development, 21(1), 211-233. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2023.79363.1205[In Persian]
  57. Mohsin, M., Zhu, Q., Naseem, S., Sarfraz, M., & Ivascu, L. (2021). Mining industry impact on environmental sustainability, economic growth, social interaction, and public health: an application of semi-quantitative mathematical approach. Processes, 9(6), 972.‏ DOI:10.3390/pr9060972
  58. Motamedi, M, & Farzaneh, M. (1401). The role of integrated urban management in the sustainable development of urban green spaces. The 8th Annual International Congress of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development. Tehran. [In Persian]
  59. Najafi, F., Parizadi, T., & Fasihi, H. (2024). Analyzing spatial linking of environmental factors and the Ssocial status of Tehran’s residents viewed from environmental justice. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 12(2), 161-178.‏ https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.379275.1964[In Persian]
  60. Omid Ali, E., Fanni, Z., & Shafieisabet, N. (2024). Prioritization of factors affecting regional development in Iran. Regional Planning, 14(54), 23-36.‏ https://doi.org/10.30495/jzpm.2022.30594.4118[In Persian]
  61. Pacione, M. (2009). Urban geography: A global perspective. Routledge.
  62. Petrescu, M. G., Panait, M., & Fu, H. (2021). Integrated management systems under the banner of sustainable development: risks and opportunities. Sustainable management for managers and engineers, 157-187. DOI:10.1002/9781119804345.ch7
  63. Pradhan, B. K., Yadav, S., Ghosh, J., & Prashad, A. (2023). Achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the Indian State of Odisha: Challenges and opportunities.World Development Sustainability, 3, 100078. DOI:10.1016/j.wds.2023.100078
  64. Reyes, G. E. (2001). Four main theories of development: modernization, dependency, word-system, and globalization. Nómadas. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas, 4(2), 109-124.
  65. Sancholi, B., Karimian Bostani, M., & Hafez Rezazadeh, M. (2022). Planning analysis, planning approaches and design of the new city of Tis In line with the regional development of Makran Coast. Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 22(64), 379-398. (In Persian)
  66. Santos, G., Afonseca, J., Lopes, N., Félix, M. J., & Murmura, F. (2018). Critical success factors in the management of ideas as an essential component of innovation and business excellence. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 10(3), 214-232.‏ DOI:10.1108/IJQSS-05-2017-0051
  67. Schaefer, A., & Crane, A. (2005).Addressing sustainability and consumption. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 76–92. DOI:10.1177/0276146705274987
  68. Sejodi, M., Zayyari, K., Pourahmad, A., & Yasoori, M. (2022). Comparative comparison of the propositions in the current model and the desired model of regional development (Case study: Guilan province). Economic Geography Research, 3(7), 94-106.‏ [In Persian]
  69. Sejoodi, M., Zayyari, K., Poorahmad, A., & Yasoori, M. (2021). Analyzing the role and position of pathology and presenting a model of regional development in domestic and foreign studies. Perspectives on urban and rural studies, 2(4), 17-37.‏ [In Persian]
  70. Shahraki, A. A. (2017). Regional development assessment: Reflections of the problem-oriented urban planning. Sustainable cities and society, 35, 224-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.07.021
  71. Shami, M. R., Bigdeli Rad, V., & Moinifar, M. (2023). Evaluation and measurement of indicators of quality of urban smart living in Tehran city. Journal of Sustainable city, 5(4), 177-192.‏ https://doi.org/20.1001.1.24766631.1401.5.4.10.5 [In Persian]
  72. Smith, H., Discetti, R., Bellucci, M., & Acuti, D. (2022). SMEs engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals: A power perspective. Journal of Business Research, 149, 112-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.021
  73. Srivastava, A. K., & Sushil. (2015). Modeling organizational and information systems for effective strategy execution. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(4), 556- 578. DOI:10.1108/JEIM-09-2013-0071
  74. Sun, X., Xiang, P., Ngoduy, D., Sui, H., & Zhang, B. (2024). Can transportation networks contribute to the sustainable development of urban agglomeration spatial structures?. Sustainable Cities and Society, 117, 105983.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105983
  75. World Bank. (2017). Atlas of Sustainable Development Goals 2017 from World Development Indicators. World Bank Publications.‏ doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-10
  76. Zarrabi, A., & Tabrizi, N. (2011). Determining the level of development of the cities of Mazandaran province - a factor analysis approach. Geographical Quarterly of Environmental Planning, 12, 63-78. [In Persian]
  77. Zavarat, A., Darsukh, R. (2020). Explaining the components of achieving sustainable environmental development in the urban management structure of Tabriz metropolis. Sustainability, Development and Environment, 2(3). 21-40. [In Persian]
  78. Zayyari, K., hatami, A., & safarpoor, A. (2021). Evaluation of dimensions and components of livability in urban areas with sustainable development approach (Case study of Khorramabad urban areas). JFCV, 2 (2) :33-50. [In Persian]
مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا
دوره 15، شماره 4
زمستان 1404
صفحه 133-151