مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا

مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا

آینده‌نگاری و تدوین سناریوهای توسعه مبتنی بر خدمات اکوسیستمی ‌ در جنگل‌های مانگرو ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه محیط‌زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران
2 گروه محیط‌زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران
چکیده
با هدف برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت صحیح در جنگل‌های مانگرو کشور به تبییـن آینده‌های گوناگون متصـور و محتمل، شناسایی نیروهای پیشران، کلان‌روندها و عدم قطعیت‌ها در این رویشگاه‌های طبیعی پرداخته شد. به‌منظور شناسایی عمده‌ترین نیروهای پیشران و کلان‌روندها فهرستی بر اساس پیشینه تحقیق و مطالعات نظری شامل 5 معیار، 12 زیر معیار و 55 شاخص تهیه گردید. جامعه آماری پرسش‌شوندگان 15 نفر بوده، که از بین کارشناسان و خبرگان با تخصص‌های مرتبط انتخاب شدند. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از طریق روش‌های تحلیل ساختاری و سناریو نگاری در نرم‌افزارهای MicMac و Scenario Wizard صورت گرفت. مطابق نتایج، در بین معیارها بیشترین ضریب اهمیت مربوط به معیار "اکولوژیک"، در بین زیرمعیارها مربوط به " اشتغال" و در بین شاخص‌ها به "وابستگی زیاد معیشت به جنگل" اختصاص‌یافته است. نتایج سناریوهای گروه‌های اول تا سوم به ترتیب بیان‌کننده وضعیت مطلوب و ایده‌آل محیط‌زیست (62 درصد)، وضعیت بینابین و ایستا (28 درصد) و وضعیت بحرانی محیط‌زیست (10 درصد) است. علاوه بر این، نتایج سناریوهای کلان ‌آینده‌ در مخروط آینده  شامل "آینده‌های مرجح" (سناریوی گروه اول)، "آینده‌های محتمل" (سناریوی گروه دوم) و "آینده‌های نامعقول" (سناریوهای گروه سوم) است که احتمال وقوع هر یک با توجه به نتایج به‌دست‌آمده قابل پیش‌بینی است. بر اساس نتایج به‌دست‌آمده، بهبود وضعیت خدمات اکوسیستمی در جنگل‌های مانگرو ایران مستلزم عملکرد برنامه‌ریزان و مسئولان در حفظ و حمایت از رویشگاه‌های طبیعی در این محدوده است، به‌گونه‌ای که در راستای حفظ منابع با ارزش زیستی آن تلاش نمایند و وضعیت بهره‌وری از خدمات اکوسیستمی در این منطقه را بهبود بخشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Foresight and Development Scenarios Based on Ecosystem Services in Mangrove Forests of ‌Iran

نویسندگان English

Parvaneh Sobhani 1
Afshin Danehkar 2
1 Department of Environmental Science, Natural Resources Faculty, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, ‎Iran‎
چکیده English

A B S T R A C T
 
To support effective planning and management of Iran’s mangrove forests, this study explores a range of conceivable and probable futures while identifying the key driving forces, macro-trends, and uncertainties shaping these ecosystems. The most influential drivers and macro-trends were identified through a review of prior research and theoretical frameworks, resulting in a structured list comprising five criteria, twelve sub-criteria, and fifty-five indicators. The study sample consisted of fifteen experts and specialists with relevant professional expertise. Data were analyzed using structural analysis and scenario-building techniques implemented through the MicMac and Scenario Wizard software packages. The results show that, among the criteria, the ecological dimension had the highest importance coefficient; among the sub-criteria, employment ranked highest; and among the indicators, the strongest influence was attributed to the “high dependence of livelihoods on forest resources.” Scenario outcomes for Iran’s mangrove forests suggest that 62% represent a desirable or ideal environmental state, 28% an intermediate and static condition, and 10% a critical or degraded state. Within the broader “futures cone,” the macro-scenarios correspond to three categories: “preferred futures” (first group), “likely futures” (second group), and “unreasonable futures” (third group), each with probabilities inferred from the analysis. The analyses highlight that improving ecosystem services in Iran’s mangrove forests depends on the commitment of planners and policymakers to conserve and enhance these natural habitats, safeguard their biological value, and strengthen the productivity of ecosystem services.
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Because of their distinctive biological characteristics, mangrove forests have long been ‌recognized as highly sensitive ecosystems. Situated in dynamic coastal environments, they have ‌evolved remarkable adaptive strategies to withstand extreme ecological conditions. These ‌unique adaptations have attracted sustained attention from international conservation ‌organizations, which consistently classify mangroves as priority protected habitats.‌
Effective planning and management of Iran’s mangrove forests require a precise understanding ‌of the ecosystem services they generate and the spatial scales at which these services are ‌produced, so that supply can be balanced with the demands of society. Against this backdrop, ‌the present study examines the multiple plausible futures of Iran’s mangrove ecosystems by ‌identifying the critical driving forces, macro-trends, and uncertainties that shape their trajectory.‌
 
Methodology
This research is applied in purpose and adopts an analytical–exploratory approach in both ‌nature and method. To identify the key driving forces, macro-trends, and uncertainties, a ‌comprehensive list was developed from prior research and theoretical studies, encompassing ‌five criteria, twelve sub-criteria, and fifty-five indicators. The study sample comprised fifteen ‌respondents, all of whom were experts and specialists with relevant professional expertise. Data ‌were analyzed using structural analysis and scenario-building techniques, implemented through ‌the MicMac and Scenario Wizard software packages.
 
Results and discussion
The results indicate that, among the criteria, the ecological dimension had the highest ‌importance coefficient; among the sub-criteria, employment ranked highest; and among the ‌indicators, the strongest influence was attributed to the “high dependence of livelihoods on ‌forest resources.” Scenario outcomes for Iran’s mangrove forests suggest that 62% represent a ‌desirable or ideal environmental state, 28% an intermediate and static condition, and 10% a ‌critical or degraded state.‌
Within the broader “futures cone,” the macro-scenarios fall into three categories: “preferred ‌futures” (first group), “likely futures” (second group), and “unreasonable futures” (third group), ‌with the probability of each inferred from the analysis. The findings further underscore that ‌improving ecosystem services in Iran’s mangrove forests depends on the commitment of ‌planners and policymakers to conserve and enhance these habitats, safeguard their biological ‌value, and strengthen the overall productivity of ecosystem services.
 
Conclusion
The findings suggest that identifying and analyzing the driving forces, macro-trends, and ‌uncertainties in Iran’s mangrove forests can provide valuable insights for implementing ‌effective management strategies in mangrove ecosystems elsewhere. Moreover, the results of ‌this analysis can inform management approaches that support effective protection and planning ‌in response to expanding human activities, associated uncertainties, and their environmental ‌consequences in these sensitive habitats. Since these forests constitute a network of biologically ‌sensitive areas and valuable resources, it is essential to develop policies and tools that mitigate ‌the impacts of overexploitation and uncontrolled human development. Furthermore, ‌conservation planning should prioritize not only preventing habitat degradation but also ‌managing Iran’s mangrove ecosystems to ensure their protection, restoration, and long-term ‌resilience.‌
 
Funding
There is funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Driving Forces
Strategic Foresight
Scenario Planning
Ecosystem Services
Mangrove Forests of Iran
  1. برهانی، محمد؛ دانه‌کار، افشین و معین‌الدینی، مظاهر. (1401). ظرفیت‌سنجی اقلیمی ناحیة ساحلی استان سیستان و بلوچستان برای توسعة مزارع بادی. محیط‌زیست طبیعی، 75 (ویژه‌نامه محیط‌زیست ساحلی و دریایی). 166-149.
  2. https://doi.org/‌20.1001.1.20087764.1401.75.5.11.3
  3. خشنود، حمیده. (1401). جنگل‌های مانگرو ایران و تنوع زیستی جانوری آن‌ها. نهمین همایش ملی مطالعات و تحقیقات نوین در حوزه زیست‌شناسی و علوم طبیعی ایران.
  4. حاتمی نژاد، حسین و سن‌ونسان، نوریکا یولیه. (1403). بررسی موانع تحقق مدیریت یکپارچه و آینده‌پژوهی حکمروایی خوب ناحیه‌ای در شهرستان تهران. آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 14 (4)، 1 17. https://doi.org/‌10.30488/GPS.2024.436271.3721
  5. دانه‌کار، افشین و سبحانی، پروانه. (1403). ارزیابی توان اکولوژیک و تعادل سنجی توسعه کلان کاربری‌ها در مجموعه شهری تهران-البرز. آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 14 (4)، 37 57. https://doi.org/‌10‌.30488/GPS.2024.466071.3759
  6. سبحانی، پروانه و دانه‌کار، افشین. (1402/الف). ارزیابی مخاطرات محیطی و آسیب‌پذیری منطقة حفاظت‌شده حرا با استفاده از مدل DPSIR. مدیریت مخاطرات محیطی، 10 (3)، 215 232. https://doi.org/‌10.22059/JHSCI.2023.366567.797
  7. سبحانی، پروانه و دانه‌کار، افشین. (1402/ب). مروری بر مطالعات سیمای طبیعی و محدوده‌های مدیریتی جنگل‌های مانگرو خمیر و قشم. طبیعت ایران، 4 (41)، 97 112. https://doi.org/‌10.22092/irn2023.362533
  8. سبحانی، پروانه و دانه‌کار، افشین. (1403/الف). تدوین سناریوهای توسعه تورهای طبیعت‌گردی پایدار در جنگل‌های مانگرو ایران. برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، 13 (49)، 120-93.https://doi.org/‌10.22080/JTPD.2024.26855.3872
  9. سبحانی، پروانه و دانه‌کار، افشین. (1403/ب). شناسایی نوع استفاده و میزان وابستگی جوامع محلی به جنگل‌های مانگرو خمیر-قشم. بوم‌شناسی جنگل‌های ایران، 12 (1)، 123-113.
  10. https://doi.org/‌10.61186/ifej.12.1.113
  11. علی بخشی، آمنه؛ پورمحمدی، محمدرضا و قربانی، رسول. (1402). سناریو نگاری نوآوری منطقه‌ای در کلان‌شهر تبریز با رویکرد آیندهپژوهی. جغرافیا، 21 (78)، 36-19. http://dor.net/dor/ 20.1001.1.27833739.1402.21.78.2.7
  12. کبیری هندی، مریم؛ میرکریمی، سیدحامد و سلمان ماهینی، عبدالرسول. (1399). ارزیابی خدمات فرهنگی اکوسیستم در استان گلستان. مطالعات علوم محیط‌زیست، 5 (2)، 2568-2560.
  13. گرمایی پور، رقیه؛ دانه‌کار، افشین؛ علم بیگی، ا.میر؛ علیزاده شعبانی، افشین و سبحانی، پروانه. (1404). مقایسه و اولویت‌بندی تهدیدهای محیطی در رویشگاه‌های طبیعی جنگل‌های مانگرو ایران. فصلنامه مخاطرات محیط طبیعی، 14 (44)، 62-37.https://doi.org/10.22111/JNEH.2024.48629.2041
  14. مافی غلامی، داوود و جعفری، ابوالفضل. (1401). بررسی در معرض قرار گرفتن جنگل‌های مانگرو سواحل جنوب ایران به مخاطرات چندگانه. محیط‌زیست طبیعی، 75، 121-137.  https://doi.org/10.22059/JNE.2023.352134.2502
  15. محمودی، بیت‌الله. (1400). جایگاه مسائل اجتماعی در فرایند برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت جنگل‌های کشور از منظر میان‌رشته‌ای. مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، 14 (1-53)، 206-179.  https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2022.4566.4526
  16. یعقوب زاده، مریم؛ سلمان ماهینی، عبدالرسول؛ میکاییلی تبریزی، علیرضا؛ دانه‌کار، افشین و مصلحی، مریم. (1400). اولویت‌بندی مخاطرات محیطی جنگل‌های مانگرو استان هرمزگان. مخاطرات محیط طبیعی، 10 (30)، 82-70.https://doi.org/‌10.22111/JNEH.2020.34699.1675
  17. Alibakhshi, A., Pourmohammadi, M., & Ghorbani, R. (2023). Scenario planning of regional innovation in Tabriz metropolis with a future research approach. Geography, 21(78), 19-36. http://dor.net/dor/ 20.1001.1.27833739.1402.21.78.2.7‌. [In Persian].‌
  18. Anu, K., Sneha, V. K., Busheera, P., Muhammed, J., & Augustine, A. (2024). Mangroves in environmental engineering: Harnessing the multifunctional potential of Nature's coastal architects for sustainable ecosystem management. Results in Engineering, 21, 101765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101765.
  19. Bimrah, K., Dasgupta, R., Hashimoto, S., Saizen, I., & Dhyani, S. (2022). Ecosystem services of mangroves: A systematic review and synthesis of contemporary scientific literature. Sustainability, 14(19), 12051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912051.
  20. Borhani, M., Danehkar, A., & Moeinaddini, M. (2023). Climatic capacity evaluation of coastal area of Sistan and Baluchistan province for the development of wind farms. Journal of Natural Environment, 75, 149-166. https://doi.org/‌20.1001.1.20087764.1401.75.5.11.3‌. [In Persian].‌
  21. Bosire, J.O., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Walton, M., Crona, B. I., Lewis III, RR., Field, C., Kairo, J.G., & Chamberland-Fontaine, S., Estrada, G. T., Heckadon-Moreno, S., & Hickey, G. M. (2022). Enhancing the sustainable management of mangrove forests: The case of Punta Galeta, Panama. Trees, Forests and People, 8, 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101765.
  22. Chamberland-Fontaine, S., Estrada, G. T., Heckadon-Moreno, S., & Hickey, G. M. (2022). Enhancing the sustainable management of mangrove forests: The case of Punta Galeta, Panama. Trees, Forests and People, 8, 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100274.
  23. Clarke, A. C. (2000). Profiles of the future: An inquiry into the limits of the possible. ‌Millennium edn, ‌Orion Books, London.‌ https:Profiles%20Of%20The%20Future%20Arthur%20C%20Clarke%20Pdf
  24. Danehkar, A., & Sobhani, P. (2024). Ecological potential evaluation and balance measurement of macro-land use in the urban set of Tehran-Alborz. Geographical Planning of Space, 14(4), 37-57. https://doi.org/‌10‌.30488/GPS.2024.466071.3759. [In Persian].‌
  25. Dhyani, S., Shukla, J., Kadaverugu, R., Dasgupta, R., Panda, M., Kundu, S. K., & Hashimoto, S. (2023). Participatory Stakeholder Assessment for Drivers of Mangrove Loss to Prioritize Evidence-Based Conservation and Restoration in Bhitarkanika and Mahanadi Delta, India. Sustainability, 15(2), 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020963.
  26. Fontalvo-Herazo, M. L., Piou, C., Vogt, J., Saint-Paul, U., & Berger, U. (2011). Simulating harvesting scenarios towards the sustainable use of mangrove forest plantations. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 19, 397-407. https://doi.org/10‌.1007/s11273-011-9224-4.
  27. Friess, D. A., Rogers, K., Lovelock, C. E., Krauss, K. W., Hamilton, S. E., Lee, S. Y., & Shi, S. (2019). The state of the ‌world's mangrove forests: past, present, and future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44(1), 89-115.‌ https://doi.org/10‌.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033302.
  28. Garmaeepour, R., Alambeigi, A., Danehkar, A., & Shabani, A. A. (2025). Mangrove forest ecosystem services and the social well-being of local communities: Unboxing a dilemma. Journal for Nature Conservation, 84, 126827. https://doi.org/10‌.1016/j.jnc.2025.126827.
  29. Garmaeepour, R., Danehkar, A., Alambeigi, A., Alizadeh Shabani, A., & Sobhani, P. (2025). Comparison and prioritization of environmental threats in natural habitats of mangrove forests of Iran. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 14(44), 37-62. https://doi.org/10.22111/‌JNEH.2024.48629.2041‌. [In Persian].‌
  30. Glenn, J. C. (2009). Futures research methodology: version 3.0. T. J. Gordon (Ed.). ‌Washington, DC: Millennium Project.‌ https://doi.org/10‌.1007/s11273-011-9224-4.
  31. Global Mangrove Alliance (GMA). (2022). Mangrove Forests Annual Report.‌ https://www.mangrovealliance.org/news/the-state-of-the-worlds.
  32. Godet, M. (2006). Strategic foresight, la ‌prospective, problems and methods, ‌Massachusetts ‌institute of ‌technology: ‌Massachusetts, USA.‌ https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020963.
  33. Haarhaus, T., & Liening, A. (2020). Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental ‌uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120033.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120033.
  34. Hagger, V., Worthington, T. A., Lovelock, C. E., Adame, M. F., Amano, T., Brown, B. M., & ‌Saunders, M. I. (2022). ‌Drivers of global mangrove loss and gain in social-ecological systems. ‌Nature Communications, 13(1), 6373.‌
  35. Hamilton, S.E., & Casey, D. (2016). Creation of a high spatio-temporal resolution global database of continuous mangrove forest cover for the 21st century (CGMFC-21). Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25 (6), 729-738.‌ https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12449.
  36. Hatami Nejad, H., & Yolyeh San Vansan, N. (2024). Investigating obstacles to realizing integrated management and future research of good regional governance in Tehran city. Geographical Planning of Space, 14(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10‌.30488/GPS.2024.436271.3721. [In Persian].‌
  37. Hendarto, T., & Yuniwati, E. D. (2024). Ecosystem services-based mangrove forest with management model strategies, sustainability of coastal natural resources. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 84, e280083. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.280083.
  38. Kabiri Hendi, M., Mirkarimi, S. H., & Salmanmahiny, A. (2020). Cultural ecosystem services assessment in Golestan Province. Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 5(2), 2560-2568. [In Persian].‌
  39. Kanzola, A. M., Papaioannou, K., & Petrakis, P. E. (2023). Environmental behavioral perceptions under ‌uncertainty of alternative economic futures. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122428.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122428.
  40. Khoshnood, H. (2022). Mangrove forests of Iran and their animal biodiversity. The 9th National Conference on Modern Studies and Research in the Field of Biology and Natural Sciences of Iran. [In Persian].‌
  41. Kissinger, N., Syahrin Noor, A., Muhayah, N.P., Violet, R. (2020). The Potential of Mangrove Forest as Natural Tourism Area Based on the Flora-Fauna Characteristics and Social Aspect Case Study: Mangrove Forest in Angsana Village. BIO web of conferences, 20, 4.‌
  42. Kozubaev, S., Elsden, C., Howell, N., Søndergaard, M. L. J., Merrill, N., Schulte, B., & ‌Wong, R. Y. (2020). ‌Expanding modes of reflection in design futuring. In Proceedings of ‌the 2020 CHI Conference on ‌Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-15.‌
  43. Lee, S. L., Then, A. Y. H., Goh, H. C., Hattam, C., Edwards-Jones, A., & Austen, M. C. (2022). Strengthened multi-stakeholder linkages in valuation studies is critical for improved decision making outcomes for valuable mangroves–The Malaysian case study. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 1033200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122428.
  44. Ling, Z., Jiang, W., Peng, K., Zhang, Z., Wu, Z., Zhong, S., & Sun, Z. (2024). SDG-and GMAG-oriented analysis of multi scenarios spatiotemporal changes and evaluation of the effectiveness and potential of mangrove forests. International Journal of Digital Earth, 17(1), 2346274.‌
  45. Mafi-Gholami, D., & Jaafari, A. (2023). Investigating the exposure of mangrove forests of the southern coast of Iran to multiple hazards. Journal of Natural Environment, 75(Special Issue Coastal and Marine Environment), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.22059/‌JNE.2023.352134.2502‌. [In Persian].‌
  46. Mahmoudi, B. (2021). The place of social issues in planning and management processes of forests in Iran from and interdisciplinary perspective. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 14(1), 179-206. https://doi.org/10.22035/isih.2022.4566.4526‌. ‌[In Persian].‌
  47. Md Sabri, M. D., Suratman, M. N., & Shari, N. H. Z. (2021). Management action plans for development of mangrove forest reserves. Mangroves: Ecology, Biodiversity and Management, 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100274.
  48. Rahmadi, M. T., Yuniastuti, E., Suciani, A., Harefa, M. S., Persada, A. Y., & Tuhono, E. (2023). Threats to mangrove ecosystems and their impact on coastal biodiversity: A study on mangrove Management in Langsa City. Indonesian Journal of Earth Sciences, 3(2), A627-A627. https://doi.org/10.52562/injoes.2023.627.
  49. Richards, D.R., & Friess, D.A. (2016). Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113 (2), 344-9.‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122428.
  50. Savari, M., Damaneh, H. E., & Damaneh, H. E. (2025). Discover the determining factors of the use of mangrove forests conservation behaviors. Journal for Nature Conservation, 83, 126768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100274.
  51. Shrestha, S., Miranda, I., Kumar, A., Pardo, M. L. E., Dahal, S., Rashid, T., & Mishra, D. R. (2019). Identifying and forecasting potential biophysical risk areas within a tropical mangrove ecosystem using multi-sensor data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 74, 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2018.09.017.
  52. Sobhani, P., & Danehkar A. (2024). Identification of the Type of Use and the Degree of Local Communities' Dependence on Khamir-Qeshm Mangrove Forests. Ecol Iran For, 12(1), 113-123. https://doi.org/‌10.61186/ifej.12.1.113‌. [In Persian].‌
  53. Sobhani, P., & Danehkar, A. (2023). Assessment of environmental hazards and vulnerability of Hara protected area using DPSIR model. Environmental Management Hazards, 10(3), 215-232. https://doi.org/‌10.22059/JHSCI.2023.366567.797. [In Persian].‌
  54. Sobhani, P., & Danehkar, A. (2023). Natural features and management areas of Khamir and Gheshm mangrove forests. Iran Nature, 8(4), 97-112. https://doi.org/‌10.22092/irn2023.362533‌. [In Persian].‌
  55. Sobhani, P., & Danehkar, A. (2023). Spatial-temporal changes in mangrove Forests for Analyzing habitat Integrity: A case of hara biosphere Reserve, Iran. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 20, 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2023.100293.
  56. Sobhani, P., & Danehkar, A. (2024). Presenting scenarios for the development of sustainable nature tourism tours with a future research approach in the mangrove forests of Iran. Journal of Tourism Planning and Development, 13(49), 93-120. https://doi.org/‌10.22080/JTPD.2024.26855.3872‌. [In Persian].‌
  57. Sobhani, P., & Danehkar, A. (2025). Key Drivers of the Environment in the Development of Tehran-Alborz Urban Complex. Results in Engineering, 105803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105803.
  58. Sobhani, P., Esmaeilzadeh, H., Sadeghi, S. M. M., ‌Marcu, M. V., & ‌Wolf, I. D. (2022). Evaluating ‌Ecotourism Sustainability ‌Indicators ‌for Protected Areas in Tehran, Iran. Forests, 13, 740. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13050740.
  59. Stormer, E., Bontoux, L., Krzysztofowicz, M., Florescu, E., Bock, A. K., & Scapolo, F. (2020). Foresight–using science and evidence to anticipate and shape the future. In Science for policy handbook (pp. 128-142). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101765.
  60. Yaghoubzadeh, M., Salmanmahiny, A., Mikaeili Tabrizi, A., Danehkar, A., & Moslehi, M. (2022). Prioritizing environmental hazards of mangrove forests in Hormozgan province. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 10(30), 69-82. https://doi.org/‌10.22111/JNEH.2020.34699.1675‌. ‌[In Persian].‌