تبیین عوامل موثر بر ارتقای وضعیت کیفی مسکن شهری مورد پژوهی: محله اتابک منطقه 15 شهر تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله مستخرج از رساله دکتری

نویسندگان

1 گروه شهرسازی، واحد شهر قدس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر باهدف بررسی عوامل موثر بر ارتقای وضعیت کیفی مسکن شهری انجام گرفت. این پژوهش ازنظر هدف کاربردی و از منظر روش توصیفی-تحلیلی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، ساکنان 8 مجتمع مسکونی محله اتابک منطقه 15 شهر تهران بودند. بر اساس فرمول کوکران تعداد 384 پرسشنامه در بین ساکنان توزیع شد. نهایتاً تعداد 380 پرسشنامه کامل و بدون خطا جمع‌آوری گردید. ابزار گرداوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه بود که روایی آن به‌صورت روایی صوری و ظاهری و همچنین روایی واگرا و پایایی پرسشنامه با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ و پایایی ترکیبی بررسی و تائید شد. تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها و اطلاعات با استفاده نرم‌افزارهای spss و pls انجام پذیرفت. یافته‌های حاصل از این پژوهش گویای آن بود که کیفیت کالبدی با ضریب مسیر 368/0، متغیر دسترسی به خدمات شهری با ضریب مسیر 339/0، متغیر شرایط اجتماعی مسکن با ضریب مسیر 169/0 و کیفیت زیست‌محیطی با ضریب مسیر 302/0 بر کیفیت مسکن تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. با توجه به ضریب مسیر به‌دست‌آمده برای متغیرهای پژوهش مقدار تأثیر آن‌ها بر کیفیت مسکن در حد متوسط ارزیابی می‌گردد. از بین عوامل شناسایی‌شده عامل کیفیت کالبدی با ضریب مسیر 368/0 دارای بیشترین تأثیر و عامل دسترسی به خدمات شهری با ضریب مسیر 339/0 در رتبه دوم قرارگرفته است همچنین این عامل بر عامل کیفیت کالبدی مسکن دارای تأثیر مثبت و معناداری است

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Explanation of Factors Affecting the Improvement of the Quality of Urban Housing Case Study: Atabak Neighborhood, District 15 of Tehran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Soroush Lotfi Bazazan 1
  • Hamid Reza Sarmi 2
  • Arash Baghdadi 1
1 Department of Urban Planning, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Arts, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

A B S T R A C T
The present study was conducted to investigate the factors affecting improving the quality of urban housing. This research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of descriptive-analytical method. The statistical population of the research was the residents of 8 residential complexes of Atabak neighborhood in District 15 of Tehran. Based on Cochran's formula, 384 questionnaires were distributed among residents. Finally, 380 complete and error-free questionnaires were collected. The data collection tool was a questionnaire, the validity of which was verified in the form of face and face validity, as well as divergent validity and reliability of the questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability. Analysis of data and information was done using SPSS and PLS software. The findings of this research showed physical quality with a path coefficient of 0.368, the variable of access to urban services with a path coefficient of 0.339, the variable of housing social conditions with a path coefficient of 0.169, and environmental quality with a path coefficient of 0.302 has a positive and significant impact on housing quality. According to the path coefficient obtained for the research variables, the amount of their impact on housing quality is evaluated as average. Among the identified factors, the factor of physical quality with a path coefficient of 0.368 has the most significant impact, and the factor of access to urban services with a path coefficient of 0.339 is ranked second. Also, this factor has a positive and significant effect on the physical quality factor of housing.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Atabak neighborhood is one of the neighborhoods of District 15 of Tehran. In this neighborhood, physical changes have been made according to the interventions of the Tehran municipality in line with the implementation of the urban landscape plan and organized (inflow of private sector capital) in different years so far. Along with these interventions, the inadequacy of infrastructure and services to meet the population's needs has become this neighborhood's basic problem. Attention to its qualitative aspect needs to be addressed. This matter is important from the point of view of providing the city's basic needs, equitable distribution of facilities and resources, reducing urban inequalities, improving economic-social indicators, preventing unbridled and unplanned expansion, and ultimately improving the quality of life of the people. It demands that the quality of housing and the factors affecting it be evaluated and that a double effort be made to improve it, and it can provide a suitable context for providing suitable models of housing quality for citizens. Considering the mentioned cases, this research aims to answer the question:
- What are the effective factors in improving the quality of housing?
 
Methodology
The current research is descriptive-analytical. In terms of purpose, it is in the category of applied research. Two library and field methods have collected the information needed for this research. In the field method, primary data collection has been done according to the research questions by designing a 5-scale Likert scale questionnaire. The statistical population of the study was the residents of Mobaat, Minabi, Atabek, Shahrak Sajjadieh, Yas, Zahid Gilani, Shahid Asadi, and Safa residential complexes located in Atabak neighborhood of District 15 of Tehran. The statistical population was equal to 20469 people, and based on Cochran's formula, 384 questionnaires were distributed among residents. Finally, 380 complete and error-free questionnaires were collected; the validity of the questionnaire was confirmed in the form of face and face validity as well as divergent validity. In order to check the reliability of the questionnaire, Cronbach's alpha and combined reliability were used, and according to the results presented in the research findings section, the reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed. The data obtained from this research were analyzed using structural modeling using SPSS and PLS software.
 
Results and discussion
This research showed that physical quality has a positive and significant effect on improving housing quality; according to the value of the obtained path coefficient, which is equal to 0.368, the value of this effect is considered moderate. Based on the results, it can be said that physical dimensions, such as the physical crystallization of housing, are the most objective and material issues in housing evaluation, analysis, and planning. Concerning the impact of access to urban services on the quality of housing, the findings indicated a significant impact of access to urban services. In explaining the results of this section, it can be said that gradually, the housing is changing from a single purpose to a shelter. Those other aspects of welfare and social comfort are also added; the limits of enjoying services and access to the essentials of life are shown to evaluate the housing quality. These indicators are very important in determining housing quality and are an integral part of housing planning. Access to urban housing services is considered one of the main indicators of life, which the Population Crisis Committee has used to measure quality in the world's metropolises. In relation to social conditions and environmental quality on the quality of housing, the results of this research confirmed the impact of the social environment and environmental quality on the quality of housing. Creating residential spaces is a topic that has been discussed previously. From the beginning, human beings have tried to create a favorable living environment that matches the quality conditions of their residence's social and environmental environment.
 
Conclusion
This research was written to explain the factors affecting improving the quality of urban housing. The findings of this research showed that among the studied factors, the physical quality factor with a path coefficient of 0.368 has the most significant impact on improving the quality of urban housing in Tehran, such that this factor can explain 13.5% of the variance of the housing quality condition variable. Physical quality is defined based on the structural basis of a building and is often defined in the form of rules and standards related to it. The physical quality is sometimes interpreted as the appearance of buildings. Since they are fixed and real things, they are the reason for the emergence of general indicators for housing evaluation. The second factor is access to urban services with a path coefficient of 0.339, so this factor can explain 11.4% of the variance of the housing quality condition variable. This factor has been ranked second regarding the impact on housing quality according to the path coefficient value obtained. In third place was the factor of environmental quality with the path coefficient value of 0.302, and this factor can explain 1.9% of the variance of the variable of housing quality. Moreover, in the last place is the factor of housing social conditions, which has a path coefficient of 0.196. Also, from the other results of this research, we can mention the positive effect of access to the quality of urban services on the improvement of the physical condition of housing, and the value of the path coefficient obtained for this effect is equal to 0.623 so that it is 38.8% of the variance of the variable.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
The authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approthe contenttent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
 We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Housing
  • Housing Planning
  • Physical Quality
  • Access to Urban Services
  • Tehran City
  1. احدنژاد روشتی، محسن، و مرادی مفرد، سمیرا. (1392). نقش استراتژی توسعه شهری در سیاست‌های تأمین مسکن گروهای کم‌درآمد شهری. برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 3(12)، 48-35.
  2. احدنژاد، محسن، تیموری، اصغر، و طهماسبی مقدم، حسین. (1398). تحلیل فضایی شاخص‌های کیفیت مسکن در نواحی شهری با رویکرد مسکن پایدار (مورد پژوهی: شهر زنجان). توسعه پایدار محیط جغرافیایی، 1(2)، 16-32. https://doi.org/10.52547/sdge.2.3.133
  3. احمدی، پروین و چاره‌جو، فرزین. (1400). بررسی میزان رضایتمندی ساکنان مسکن مهر از کیفیت سکونتی آن با رویکردی ویژه به شاخص‌های مسکن پایدار نمونه موردی: مسکن مهر شهرک بهاران. نشریه برنامه‌ریزی فضایی، 11(1)، 151-178. https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2020.116756.1378
  4. آجیلیان، شیوا؛ رفیعیان، مجتبی و آقاصفری، عارف. (1395). اصول، ابعاد و متغیرهای رضایتمندی سکونتی در برنامه‌ریزی مسکن مهر. مطالعات شهری،19(3)، 36-27.
  5. آرشین، مهسا و سرور، رحیم. (1396). ارزیابی سیاست‌های اجرایی دولت در تأمین مسکن گروه‌های کم‌درآمد شهری. مطالعات مدیریت شهری، 9(3)، 95-81.
  6. آزاده، سیدرضا؛ محمدی سیداحمدیانی، جمال؛ و نشاط دوست، حمید. (1399). بررسی ارتباط بین شاخص‌های کمّی مسکن و سلامت روانی شهروندان مطالعه موردی: محله مرداویج- اصفهان. نشریه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، 24(72)، 33-1.
  7. پوردهقان، حافظه؛ شاه‌چراغی، آزاده و مختاباد امرئی، سیدمصطفی. (1398). سنجش و تحلیل قواعد نظری مسکن مطلوب با تکیه بر آرای مردم، مسکن و محیط روستا، 165(3)،96-81.
  8. پورطاهری، مهدی؛ فضلعلی، زینب و رکن‌الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا. (1396). تحلیل فضایی الگوی مسکن پایدار روستایی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای استان مازندران). برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا. ۲۱ (۱)، ۹۵-۱۳۱.
  9. پیری، فاطمه؛ امانپور، سعید و مشکینی، ابوالفضل. (1401). تحلیل الگوی فضایی سرمایه‌گذاری مسکن از منظر اقتصاد سیاسی فضا مطالعه موردی: کلان‌شهر اهواز. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 12(1)، 34-15. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2022.338820.3527
  10. جلالی، مینا، و ناجی اصفهانی، زهرا. (1398). کیفیت مسکن از نگاه شهروندان اصفهانی. صفه، 29(86)، 36-21. https://doi.org/10.29252/soffeh.29.3.21
  11. درویش، پژمان؛ منصوری، بهروز و جاویدی نژاد، مهرداد. (1401). معماری احیاکننده در ارتقای کیفیت مسکن و بافت فرسوده در ایران. توسعه پایدار شهری، 3(9)، 93-112. https://doi.org/10.22034/usd.2023.704580
  12. زیاری، سمیه؛ فرهودی، رحمت‌الله؛ پوراحمدی، احمد و حاتمی نژاد، حسین. (1396). الگوی تأمین مسکن گروه‌های کم‌درآمد، پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 49(4)، 869 883.  https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20086296.1396.49.4.10.2
  13. سالاری پور، علی‌اکبر، غیاثوندمحمدخانی، سعید، و شعبانی کلاچاهی، سجاد. (1401). ارزیابی کیفیت زندگی ساکنین مسکن مهر (مطالعه موردی: شهر رشت). پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 13(48)، 87-102. https://doi.org/10.30495/jupm.2022.4269
  14. قربانی، رسول؛ علیزاده، هوشمند و کرمی، سونیا. (1401). بررسی عوامل موثر بر وضعیت آینده مسکن در کلان‌شهر تبریز. مجله آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 12(4)، 1-17. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2021.252181.3318
  15. قره بگلو، مینو، و روحی فر، سولماز. (1397). تاریخ ذهنیت عامه عاملی تأثیرگذار بر کیفیت مسکن. معماری و شهرسازی (هنرهای زیبا)، 23(1)، 67-80. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2018.238201.671763
  16. معمری، ابراهیم، میرکتولی، جعفر، و بزی، خدارحم. (1398). ارزیابی و پایش سیاست‌های تأمین مسکن گروه‌های کم‌درآمد شهری از منظر شاخص‌های پایداری مسکن (مطالعه موردی: مسکن مهر گرگان). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 7(4)، 723-741. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.265122.969
  17. Ahadnejad, M., Teymouri, A., & Tahmasebi, H. (2021). Spatial analysis of Housing Quality Indices with Emphasis on Sustainable Housing Approach (Case study: Zanjan City). Sustainable Development of Geographical Environment, 2(3), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.52547/sdge.2.3.133 [In Persian].
  18. Ahmadi, P., & Charehjoo, F. (2021). Investigating the Level of Residents’ Satisfaction with the Residential Quality of the Mehr Housing Project Focusing on Sustainable Housing Indicators. Spatial Planning, 11(1), 151-178. doi: 10.22108/sppl.2020.116756.1378[In Persian].
  19. Ajilian, M., Rafieian, S., & Ahgasafari, A. (2016). Principles, dimensions and variables concerning the residential satisfaction in Mehr housing project (the case study of Mehregan town). Motaleate Shahri, 5(19), 27-36. [In Persian].
  20. Anierobi, C. M., Nwalusi, D. M., Efobi, K. O., Nwosu, K. I., Nwokolo, N. C., & Ibem, E. O. (2023). Urban Housing Inequality and the Nature of Relationship Between Formal and Informal Settlements in Enugu Metropolis, Nigeria. SAGE Open, 13(3), 12-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231192390
  21. Arshin, M., & Sarvar, R. (2017). Assessment of the Executive Policies of the Government on Providing Housing for Low-income Urban Groups (Case Study: Metropolitan City of Mashhad. Urban Management Studies, 9(30), 81-95. [In Persian].
  22. Azadeh, S. R., Mohammadi, J., & Neshat Dost, H. T. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between quantitative indicators of housing and the citizens’ mental health Case study: Mardavij neighborhood- Isfahan. Geography and Planning, 24(72), 1-33. [In Persian].
  23. Buglione, F. (2020). A new approach to urban planning. A reiterable model of co-housing. UPLanD-Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape & environmental Design, 5(1), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.6093/2531-9906/7134
  24. D’Souza, R. (2019). Housing poverty in urban India: The failures of past and current strategies and the need for a new blueprint. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation. ORF Occasional, 14(3), 2-22. https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/
  25. Darvish, A., Mansouri, B., & Javidinejad, M. (2023). The Regenerative Architecture Application in Improving the Quality of Housing and Dilapidated Fabric Areas in Iran. Sustainable Urban Development, 3(9), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.22034/usd.2023.704580 [In Persian].
  26. Fang, X., & Lv, Y. (2023). Housing prices and green innovation: evidence from Chinese enterprises. Management Decision, 2(3), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2023-0368
  27. Ge, J., & Kazunori, H (2006). Research on residential lifestyles in Japanese cities from the viewpoints of residential preference, residential choice and residential satisfaction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 3(78), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.07.004.
  28. Gharehbaglou, M., & Roohifar, S. (2018). The history of public mentalities as an influential factor on the quality of housing. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 23(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2018.238201.671763 [In Persian].
  29. GHorbani, R., alizadeh, H., & karami, S. (2023). Survey the factors affecting the future situation of housing in the Tabriz metropolis. Geographical Planning of Space, 12(4), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2021.252181.3318 [In Persian].
  30. Hussey, L. K., & Malczewski, J. (2018). Housing quality evaluation using Analytic Network Process: a case study in the Ashanti Region, Ghana. African Geographical Review37(3), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2016.1253486
  31. Inch, A., & Shepherd, E. (2020). Thinking conjuncturally about ideology, housing and English planning. Planning Theory, 19(1), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219887771
  32. Jalali, M., Naji Isfahani, Z., & Khademolfogharae, M. (2019). Quality of Housing: Viewpoints of Citizens of Isfahan. Soffeh, 29(3), 21-36. [In Persian].
  33. Kuchler, T., Piazzesi, M., & Stroebel, J. (2023). Housing market expectations. In Handbook of Economic Expectations Academic Press, 23(2),163-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822927-9.00013-6
  34. Kuddus, M. A., Tynan, E., & McBryde, E. (2020). Urbanization: a problem for the rich and the poor?. Public health reviews, 41(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-019-0116-0
  35. Moammeri, E., Miralikatouli, J., & Bazzi, K. (2019). Evaluating and Monitoring Housing Supply Policies for Urban Livelihoods Groups in terms of Housing Stability Indicators (Case Study: Mehrghane Housing). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 7(4), 723-741. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2019.265122.969 [In Persian].
  36. Nikezic, A., Ristic Trajkovic, J., & Milovanovic, A. (2021). Future Housing Identities: Designing in Line with the Contemporary Sustainable Urban Lifestyle. Buildings 2(3), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010018
  37. Piri, F., Amanpour, S., & Meshkini, A. (2022). Analysis of the Spatial Pattern of Housing Investment from the Perspective of the Political Economy of Space (Case Study: Ahvaz Metropolis). Geographical Planning of Space, 12(1), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2022.338820.3527 [In Persian].
  38. Poordehghan H, SHahcheraghi A, Mokhtabad S M. (2019) Evaluation and Analysis of the Theoretical Principles of Desirable Housing According to the Opinions of the Citizens. JHRE, 38 (165),81-96. [In Persian].
  39. Poortaheri M, fazlali Z. Spatial Analysis of Sustainable Rural Housing Case Study: Villages in Mazandaran Province. MJSP, 21 (1), 95-131. [In Persian].
  40. Rioux, L., & Werner, C. (2011). Residential satisfaction among aging people living in place. Journal of environmental psychology, 31(2), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.12.001
  41. Salaripour, A., Ghiasvand Mohammadkhani, S., & Shabani Kolachahi, S. (2022). Assessment of the quality of life of the residents of MEHR housing, case study: Rasht city. Research and urban planning, 13(48), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.30495/jupm.2022.4269 [In Persian].
  42. Shahab, S., Hartmann, T., & Jonkman, A. (2020). Strategies of municipal land policies: Housing development in Germany, Belgium, and Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 29(6), 1132-1150.
  43. Telfar-Barnard, L., Bennett, J., Howden-Chapman, P., Jacobs, D. E., Ormandy, D., Cutler-Welsh, M., & Keall, M. (2017). Measuring the effect of housing quality interventions: the case of the New Zealand “rental warrant of fitness”. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(11), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111352
  44. United Nations. (2017). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision; United Nations: New York, NY, USA.1-126. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031151
  45. Westaway, M. S. (2006). A longitudinal investigation of satisfaction with personal and environmental quality of life in an informal South African housing settlement, Doornkop, Soweto. Habitat International, 30(1), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2004.09.003
  46. Winston, N. (2022). Sustainable community development: Integrating social and environmental sustainability for sustainable housing and communities. Sustainable Development, 30(1), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2238
  47. Yap, J. B. H., Yong, P. S., & Skitmore, M. (2019). Analysing the desired quality of housing in the Klang Valley region, Malaysia. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 25(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2019.1626542
  48. Zhang, F., Zhang, C., & Hudson, J. (2018). Housing conditions and life satisfaction in urbanChina. Cities, 81, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.012
  49. Ziari, S., Farhodi, R., Pourahmad, A., & Hataminejad, H. (2017). Patterns for Providing Low Income Groups with Housing (Case Study: Karaj City). Human Geography Research, 49(4), 869-883. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20086296.1396.49.4.10.2 [In Persian].